Soupman Inc. (fka SOUPQ)

[OBE]

I appreciate your salutation: "OBE-Appreciate your input but,"

but I feel I must defend my post in the interest of accuracy:

"My friend your high energy release for an explanation of our terminology was not necessary"

That, albeit mild, is a thinly-veiled insult.

I'm sitting here at my desk watching 6-monitors for activity in my over 60 open positions. I'm watching the Stock Market reports on TV, and I'm reading and commenting on FB to my personal and political posts.

In all my posts I try to be factual and concise, but not at the expense of clarity. I try not to make ambiguous accusations and explanations. When I comment there's not much room for confusion. Although many readers accuse me of being pedantic and verbose and resent my command of the language, I am neither. I am merely trying to make an unmistakable and irrefutable debater's point. I love debate!

If I am "as comedians put it" too hip for the room, that's not a fault of mine. Some people enjoy my "essays." Mostly, I suspect, those who like to read.

In this instance you pooh-pooh my reply claiming there was absolutely nothing offensive in either of your posts, and that is not true. You are both "taking shots" at someone and I insist he doesn't deserve it.

The post you replied to contained these statements:

"Its sad that people try and manipulate others into selling..."

"...am willing to lose my money then to believe someone else that is full of BS.


Your post:

"Clev- I agree with you 1000%-Its amazing how CONvincing "THEY" can be."

You're saying there's a CON job here.