I arrived at largely the same conclusions that you did Fred. Personally I feel the author is unfairly and disparagingly biased against IPCI and the his "reasoning" leaves much to be desired. Later he goes on to state he doesn't trust the company because it is a husband and wife operation- given his largely logical approach to the rest of his analysis this seems out of character and unfair to IPCI given what they have going for them. In addition, IPCI's technology has yet to fail them in any endeavor- you can't say the same thing about their competitors. I feel the author had financial reasons to avoid mentioning IPCI and shouldn't be considered a good source of information. Just my .02