InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 46
Posts 3467
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 07/21/2003

Re: HhH post# 5666

Tuesday, 08/12/2003 1:10:39 PM

Tuesday, August 12, 2003 1:10:39 PM

Post# of 248947
3h you underestimate the "strength" of the bargaining position inherent in the technology.

SKS had chips to play. Yes the weak financial quandry played into INTC's hands, but he still held the key to pulling off much of what TCG aspires to accomplish.

What you posit ignores that big chip in wholesale fashion, suggesting either: 1) you know & it doesn't serve to make yer point; or 2) yer incapable (b/c yer mired in cynicism) of recognizing the significance of the tech (disruptive tech btw) & cannot factor it into what SKS had on his side of the table; [edit] or 3) you didn't factor it into analysis at all bc/ you missed it, don't have experience in the area, are smoking "medical" marijuana, or some other such thing (we'll see if that = an "attack" - i doubt 3h'd think so, but we'll see if Matt does).

IMO making the INTC deal was verrrrrry different than the seires H_ell deal. You seem to be collapsing the former dynamic into the latter.

have you done much (any) negotiating in your career?

regards,

SPIN


Join the InvestorsHub Community

Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.