Isn't the "legal" contract supposed to be for a "conservatorship"? The goal being to bring the company back to their independent old self. I realize that an amendment changed this outcome but based on the Billions these companies are churning out (especially so soon after the much needed "amendment"), someone had other plans for their money. If not, then most people would think they would have issued a new amendment that said "Oops somehow we didn't realize you were going to be making Billions again, it looks like we are paid off...". I think most people are just in awe and disbelief that this is actually happening and that they are getting around that intent?
Market Data 
Markets 
AI
