News Focus
News Focus
Followers 238
Posts 15504
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 03/29/2014

Re: exwannabe post# 111118

Sunday, 04/02/2017 12:07:20 PM

Sunday, April 02, 2017 12:07:20 PM

Post# of 822962
I agree ex. Yonemura primarily deals with LP and the MFN clause. There is really no mention of Adam or Buzdar or P5 in these other two cases.

Perhaps those arguing for the Yonemura and the Tharp/Henkel cases think they played some sort of role in LP doing away with that MFN clause, and feel then that they are entitled to having at least their fees covered. Whether we'll see any money returned to NWBO is doubtful, but I guess possible. I'll be honest, I doubt the lawyers are arguing for that to be the case at all, but we'll see.

We all know that the reason the MFN clause was removed was to stay on NASDAQ and really had nothing to do with the lawsuit. But I'm sure a persistent lawyer for these cases would argue otherwise.

Therefore, in the interests of putting these lawsuits behind them, the company would most likely simply use their insurance to cover the legal fees of those lawyers, and be done with them.
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent NWBO News