NorthWest Biotherapeutics Inc (NWBO)

[biosectinvestor]

This is great Senti and thanks very much for your following this so closely!

I signed up for Pacer a long time ago, and I don't think I'm paying anything, this is what I see:

The document you requested is 32 pages and there is no charge for viewing opinions.

https://ecf.mdd.uscourts.gov/doc1/09318452132

Your links did not work for me, but searching the case file did, and then viewing the history and documents.

https://ecf.mdd.uscourts.gov/doc1/09318452132

Case File: 8:15-cv-02532-GJH

I was able to download the PDF for free. You just need to sign-up, I believe, for free, locate the case, and you can download it all.

By the way, the standard the court used prior to ruling against the plaintiff's, is the standad for all cases, they have to ASSUME all the facts the plaintiff plead are true, and then determine if they actually stated a legal case. Apparently, even at such a low standard, where they assume that everything they said was true, which is very probably not the case, they still could not state any legal claims. That's pretty awesome!

Here is the original complaint by the plaintiffs, just for informational purposes, now dismissed:

http://securities.stanford.edu/filings-documents/1056/NBI00_01/2015826_f02c_15CV02532.pdf

This appears to be the plaintiff:

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Chad_Lerner

A lot of my friends who are studying or have studied medicine or science, work for hedge funds on the side. I have no idea if that is the case here. It's good money for those that do though.

It will be interesting to me, to see if references to Rule 11, in the other case, not this one, were just references to refiling complaints or amending complaints, or something more serious for plaintiff's counsel.