Frank,
Unless you are going to prohibit the use of an officers title it makes little sense to nitpick over the use of an officers name or initials.
In particular, referencing the CEO by name regardless of whether the comment is positive, negative or neutral is accepted practice by commentators both amateur and professional.
To refer to the man (or woman) that signs the quartlery report as being in charge of the company and therefore responsible for it's situation (good or bad) does not constitute a personal attack.
Yes, we are speculating on a great many things. If true, some of them would place the CEO of AVBC in a very bad spot. If untrue, they will likely be forgotten in the unqualified success that will surely follow. If any of these specualtions are manufactured attempts to manipulate the price of the stock or interfere with the operation of the company, it is the responsibility of the SEC and/or the company itself to deal with those issues.
I understand that a 1 million share a week average dilution is difficult to swallow. The responsibility for it falls to the man at the top. What ever we get to call him.
BTW, I'm not calling the CEO here a liar or a thief. Nor am I saying that what is happening is even illegal. All I am saying is that what is going on makes this a very questionable investment. Each reader must make up his or her mind and decide if they wish to buy, sell or hold a position in AVBC. For those that read what I have to say and chose to investigate it for themselves...GREAT! For those that disagree for whatever reason...GREAT! I would be immensely pleased to find another answer that places this in a more favorable light. By all means show me! I would be happy to be wrong here.
David Weed
aka the Bird of Prey
www.warp-drive.com
News 
Market Data 
Discover 
