So yes, no offence taken... LOL It does not bother me at all.
I'm also sorry if anyone has trouble putting 2+2 together when the equation is not all in one post.
Go to 9:30, On Keystroke Encryption "Being looked at by the Anti-Virus Companies as something they need badly and we are in some discussions with some and starting to get some Deals done in that respect"
At 32 min "and Yes we do sell products through McAffee also"
And when "he says and Yes we do sell products through McAffee also" This maybe be Keystroke Guard which he is demonstrating "which is GuardedID" if you listen or he could be referring to Mobile Trust.
Either way SFOR/ACS is selling products through McAffee.
And in reply to your statement to Jtech:
All ik is if intel was licensing sfor patent we wouldnt be struggling inder a penny
If the fact we were selling products through McAffee were released, we wouldn't be struggling under a Penny also.
I first saw it here
Then I heard Mark mention it 2 times
If StrikeForce/ACS is working with McAffee and McAffee is owned Intel. And you see Intel adding Hardware MultiFactor Authentication, it not out of the Realm of Possibility that it's StrikeForce's IP.
This dispite someone posting that MSFT is working with Intel on MultiFactor Authentication. MSFT does not Own SFOR's Patents and can't can't colaborate with Intel in utilizing StrikeForce's IP