Monday, February 27, 2017 11:09:11 AM
Bevacizumab in rGBM
From the ADCOM Briefing Book
Tumor assessment criteria in this study were adapted from the WHO criteria for use with MRI scans in brain cancer and incorporated corticosteroid dose and clinical deterioration attributable to progressive tumor burden (Macdonald et al.1990):
• Index lesions are contrast-enhancing lesions with clear borders that are ≥ 10 mm at baseline. These lesions were measured bi-dimensionally at each scan using the outer diameter of the contrast-enhancing component, and the sum of the product of diameters (SPD) of index lesions was calculated at each visit.
• Non-index lesions are enhancing lesions that are small or with unclear borders, as well as non-contrast-enhancing lesions (such as hyper-intensity on FLAIR sequences) or leptomeningeal disease.
• A complete response required disappearance of all index and non-index lesions; in addition, the patient could not be taking corticosteroids above the physiologic level (i.e., equivalent of 20 mg of hydrocortisone per day) and could have no observed clinical deterioration by investigator assessment.
• A partial response required a ≥ 50% decrease in the SPD of index lesions; in addition, the corticosteroid dose at the time of the MRI scan could be no greater than the maximum dose used in the first 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. The patient could have no observed clinical deterioration by investigator assessment.
• Both complete and partial responses had to be confirmed at a second scan at least 4 weeks later.
• Progressive disease was defined by any of the following: appearance of a new lesion, ≥ 25% increase in the SPD of index lesions compared with the nadir, unequivocal progression of non-index lesions, including non-contrast-enhancing lesions, or clear clinical deterioration by investigator assessment in the absence of radiologic worsening.
.................................................
Notice requirement for confirmation of Complete Response and Partial Response, but not progressive disease.
Also notice, this trial used Macdonald + FLAIR. Just like the DCVax P3 trial uses.
From the ADCOM Briefing Book
Tumor assessment criteria in this study were adapted from the WHO criteria for use with MRI scans in brain cancer and incorporated corticosteroid dose and clinical deterioration attributable to progressive tumor burden (Macdonald et al.1990):
• Index lesions are contrast-enhancing lesions with clear borders that are ≥ 10 mm at baseline. These lesions were measured bi-dimensionally at each scan using the outer diameter of the contrast-enhancing component, and the sum of the product of diameters (SPD) of index lesions was calculated at each visit.
• Non-index lesions are enhancing lesions that are small or with unclear borders, as well as non-contrast-enhancing lesions (such as hyper-intensity on FLAIR sequences) or leptomeningeal disease.
• A complete response required disappearance of all index and non-index lesions; in addition, the patient could not be taking corticosteroids above the physiologic level (i.e., equivalent of 20 mg of hydrocortisone per day) and could have no observed clinical deterioration by investigator assessment.
• A partial response required a ≥ 50% decrease in the SPD of index lesions; in addition, the corticosteroid dose at the time of the MRI scan could be no greater than the maximum dose used in the first 6 weeks after initiation of therapy. The patient could have no observed clinical deterioration by investigator assessment.
• Both complete and partial responses had to be confirmed at a second scan at least 4 weeks later.
• Progressive disease was defined by any of the following: appearance of a new lesion, ≥ 25% increase in the SPD of index lesions compared with the nadir, unequivocal progression of non-index lesions, including non-contrast-enhancing lesions, or clear clinical deterioration by investigator assessment in the absence of radiologic worsening.
.................................................
Notice requirement for confirmation of Complete Response and Partial Response, but not progressive disease.
Also notice, this trial used Macdonald + FLAIR. Just like the DCVax P3 trial uses.
Recent NWBO News
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/26/2025 05:15:34 AM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
