Your notion of what plagiarism is seems pretty aggressive. How would I go about plagizarizing a prediction exactly? A more reasonable view might be that we agree that the judge found that DFMI was the licensee and that this is likely to be reflected in the settled order.
The second motion you don't recall -- bizarrely-- is the motion to strike or retax costs. You must remember this! Dimension was seeking damages for legal expense as abuse of process, but then withdrew that claim. Surely you haven't forgotten? Didn't you say that Dimension wants the judge to order that there be legal fees paid as part of costs?