olddog967, you said
If they are doing their job as they are already getting paid to do, just what else can they be expected to do in order to finalize more licenses in a shorter time frame
They could come up with some real nice product or idea of a product that could convince the guys to license....they could structure the deal in a way that leaves both the other company and IDCC in a win-win situation....they could pursue matters more aggresively (above and beyond their duties) and get a new license....the point is there could be lot more to licensing than what we can understand or think of. If IDCC's patents could sell by themselves and that is all IDCC does, then we wouldn't be needing the management, right. What I am trying to say is give the guys some time (7 months afyer LG is seeming long for many people...but, it could be normal in licensing....we have seen how NOK behaved even after ICC and judge confirmation....if it is so simple and straight forward, then NOK, Samsung and the "company with integrety" would have signed long back). They just announced the new "more or nothing" scheme for half of their RSUs...let's see how they do and what their goals and targets are.
My intent is not to say that you are saying anything against mgmt...but, there are posters on this board who just grab the posts and twist them to make their point.
Goodluck All!
-vg_future
AI
Market Data 
Markets 
