News Focus
News Focus
Followers 0
Posts 1829
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: sonic22 post# 165202

Friday, 08/18/2006 2:16:40 PM

Friday, August 18, 2006 2:16:40 PM

Post# of 435830
The shareholders should also be informed as to the duration of the no infringement law suit standoff that IDCC gave to Nok.

And, if Sam wins a right to the same deal in their current arbitration, then 2 industry leaders may be immune from 3G litigation by IDCC, and therefore cannot be expected to sign 3G licenses that will produce any 3G revenues for IDCC. Such a scenario would seem to be materially very different than the reasonable and current expectations of the analyst and investor community currently i.e. no such block so as to completely prevent signing new 3G licenses with any of the remaining top prospects.

If the no infringement lawsuit giveaway period has already expired, then why not disclose that fact? My inference is that the no lawsuit agreement may still be in effect at this time, but for how much longer? Does this issue relate in any way to the new bonus scheme, targets, and 2008 timeframe?

IDCC's complete and utter failure to disclose this vital and IMO material information to shareholders, and also the specific targets that will trigger substantially increased compensation, are more than a little disturbing.

MO,
Corp_Buyer

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News