It is you who must answer the most basic question, which is what part of 3(a)(10)was not followed? You have talked about this rule for weeks now and can't just post what section of it was supposedly violated. Why am I having to do all this proofing against a supposed rule violation that you can't seem to plainly state? If you know definitively who "Silberstein" is, then you shouldn't have to ask me about their registration. Why ask me? Why not just post proof?