In the United States, the onus is upon you to prove some sort of wrongdoing. It is not my job, nor anyone else's, to constantly prove the innocence of the company or anyone else for that matter. Address the specific section(s) of 3(a)(10) that was/were not properly addressed, in your opinion, or what are we even debating? If there is such a glaring problem with how 3(a)(10) was handled, then it should be easy for you to copy and paste the section of the Exemption that hasn't been adhered to.