InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 62
Posts 7554
Boards Moderated 1
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: loophole73 post# 38163

Monday, 07/28/2003 4:07:00 AM

Monday, July 28, 2003 4:07:00 AM

Post# of 432695


The Idcc Nok arbitration proceedings offer a forum where the parties can continue negotiations. Idcc wants arbitration because it inserts a timetable for the dispute. Nok, being the payor would probably not opt for it if they didn't have to participate. Idcc has a choice. They can either hang tough or not. Based on past performances, they will probably make some concessions and settle. Nok will use delaying tactics as much as the panel allows them to, feeling that the delay puts more pressure on Idcc. Success in 3G licensing would certainly lessen the pressure on Idcc to make concessions in the Nok dispute. I don't think we longs should focus on the time that arbitration might take but rather on our success in getting new licensees, esp 3G. I agree with Loop that if Ericy will not pay us for their use of 3G IPR we need to start suit against them sooner rather than later. If the settlement with Nok includes a 3G license, then we would probably be able to quickly settle the 3G suit with Ericy.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News