Boards
News
Market Data
Markets
Discover
Discover
AI Subscribe Login/Register account icon
S&P 500
7,563.63
(
0.58%
)
US TECH 100
29,447.20
(
0.92%
)
Dow Jones
50,668.97
(
0.05%
)
Brent Oil
92.18
(
-0.28%
)
Bitcoin
73,458.63
(
-1.90%
)
News Focus
News Focus
Post# of 436126
Next 10
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next

la-tsla-fan

Send PM Follow Ignore
Followers 18
Posts 3340
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 05/18/2005

la-tsla-fan

Re: loophole73 post# 410834

Wednesday, 08/17/2016 4:05:17 PM

Wednesday, August 17, 2016 4:05:17 PM

Post# of 436126
Loop, I agree.

However, QCOM's rates did run afoul of China's anti-monopoly regulations (such as they are). QCOM paid close to a billion dollar fine and THEN licensed or re-licensed (I am not certain how many of the license announcements involved new licenses) a whole bunch of manufacturers in China. Most of them are bit players but perhaps their cumulative contribution is measurable. To my knowledge, IDCC has yet to announce a Chinese license reached after their settlement with the NDRC.

Please correct me if I am wrong.

LA
Public Reply Private Reply New Post
Keep Last Read
Replies (1) Keep Last Read Next 10 Report Keyboard Shortcuts
Replies (1) Next 10 Prev Next
Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Detailed Quote
Recent IDCC News
More IDCC News