Tornado Alley (PROG)

[fuagf]

F6, ooi, why aren't Alex Jones' malicious statements such as

"Well we know Hillary likes to kill people ... she's got a long
history of having her henchmen do it. She bragged about it."

defamatory? I've looked at

10 things you should know about ... libel
posted by Alasdair Taylor on Thu, 22/03/2012 - 08:12
http://www.seqlegal.com/blog/10-things-you-should-know-about-libel

and

Online Defamation Law
https://www.eff.org/issues/bloggers/legal/liability/defamation

In simple terms .. is it basically

[–]Ardhen. 4 points 11 months ago

Especially by the people who he claims are 'part of the Illuminati'

Prove it's not true.. are you from the US? Our liable laws are sorta lame.. burden of proof is
actually on the plaintif.. so it's not enough to say "this guy said i'm illuminati but I say i'm not"

Which is why Jones, Beck, Limbaugh, and others NEVER say something that can be proven false.
https://www.reddit.com/r/conspiratard/comments/3icegw/why_hasnt_alex_jones_been_sued_for_libel_or/

that it would be difficult for a plaintiff to prove Alex Jones' statements, such as those about Hillary above, are false?

Is that basically why assholes as Jones can virtually get away with saying just about anything about anyone they feel like maligning?