DD Support Board and Research Team

[12yearplan]

Kitt, short answer from me is something to the effect of proof will be in the pudding. Yes, any fair assessment which I assume is the point here (of course welcome to all challenges) and comparatively speaking; to the exhaustive DD evidenced to this board on other tickers CDNL has arguably received a free ride. The one poster ‘gitreal’ whom had done some earlier DD was acknowledged by myself for the very worthy inputs – again, comparatively speaking and given the poster self acknowledged details of which were limited in their scope. No, I’m only the final arbitrator for myself, any cursory and early proclamation of ‘scam’ I hope will be tossed out on it’s head by the researchers here whom need not “ask anyone's permission or pass their muster” with their near lifetime of relevant acquired skills. Not there yet.
“So, people on this board are now to stop posting about this scam until there's evidence that you will judge post worthy?”
To the contrary – what do you have to add?.
Thanks.