Thats enough insight for us here until a new problem arrives :o)
langostino posted an article on Finland's Linus Torvolds that may be interesting for Sheriff Matt and BobZ to read in regards to this iHub and Silicon Investor in the current chaos of Raging Bull and other investing sites dealing with non investing posts.
The first language of Mr. Torvolds is not English, so some of his sentences need to be re-read. I included that section that might be interesting in a business sense to Matt & Bob, and especially to Bob if Si and iHub experience growth in both functionality & use. d:oug #msg-1172585 Date:7/5/2003 Linus Torvolds interview http://www.bayarea.com/mld/mercurynews/6238207.htm Posted on Fri, Jul. 04, 2003 ... A: I think it ultimately the only way to do software. I have arguments why. The main one is the complexity issue. It's very hard for someone who doesn't work like this to keep control of an increasingly complex source base and increasingly complex user base. If you try to control the process too much, you can go straight to the end point where you want to go. That works well if you know where the end point is. If you don't know where it is and you can't control where people want to use your software, it's a very bad thing to have one branch that is very concentrated on one line of development. The best analogy is... A perfect case in genetics is sharks. They are very stable but they also don't evolve anymore.... Q: That's what Bill Gates is. A: That's a fairly good analogy but sharks is a bad word. I should make up another example....