News Focus
News Focus
Followers 6
Posts 238
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/24/2015

Re: Dank02 post# 66078

Saturday, 09/26/2015 12:15:28 AM

Saturday, September 26, 2015 12:15:28 AM

Post# of 70086
no videos, no proof, and no credibility... what you're proving is that the device picks up electric impulses.

eeg disadvantages: Low spatial resolution on the scalp. fMRI, for example, can directly display areas of the brain that are active, while EEG requires intense interpretation just to hypothesize what areas are activated by a particular response.[18]
EEG poorly measures neural activity that occurs below the upper layers of the brain (the cortex).
Unlike PET and MRS, cannot identify specific locations in the brain at which various neurotransmitters, drugs, etc. can be found.[12]
Often takes a long time to connect a subject to EEG, as it requires precise placement of dozens of electrodes around the head and the use of various gels, saline solutions, and/or pastes to keep them in place. While the length of time differs dependent on the specific EEG device used, as a general rule it takes considerably less time to prepare a subject for MEG, fMRI, MRS, and SPECT.
Signal-to-noise ratio is poor, so sophisticated data analysis and relatively large numbers of subjects are needed to extract useful information


so this states that the eeg picks up noise??? heres the source:

http://www.dept.cs.ucl.ac.uk/research/equator/papers/Documents2002/Mel_presence_2002.pdf

but hey, at least you gave it a shot