News Focus
News Focus
Followers 74
Posts 15870
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 04/26/2010

Re: dmlcento post# 56716

Tuesday, 08/18/2015 2:31:58 PM

Tuesday, August 18, 2015 2:31:58 PM

Post# of 448082
I like the article until I got to the end - he makes a critical mistake - R-IT results will only apply to pure EPA drugs, and AMRN IP will prevent anyone else from marketing Rx versions for CV protection (DS might take advantage though):

And we also remain skeptical on another point: the question of whether Amarin itself will really benefit from winning the case in the long run.

Amarin has already invested in the outcomes trial (REDUCE-IT), and is still likely to complete it by the end of 2017. If the trial fails, the company will be obliged to abandon the off-label campaign – as even the Manhattan court would agree that promoting a CV benefit in the face of a failed trial would qualify as misleading. And who knows what additional fallout may come in that event.

But what if the trial succeeds? Amarin will then have conducted a definitive and expensive study to win a landmark claim that its product improved CV outcomes. And the company will also have established the legal principle that anyone else selling fish oil can make a similar claim without paying for the trial.

The Thought Police: To censor and protect. Craig Bruce

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent AMRN News