DD Support Board and Research Team

[1manband]

None of which is plausible. Especially considering the 3.75 BILLION asset, which is guaranteed to be completely bogus.

That alone would make the owner of such an asset (which is unnamed - I wonder why?) one of the largest asset holders in Europe. So why would such a holder merge with a VERY DIRTY non-SEC reporting pink sheet shell instead of going public on their own? Especially one with a dirty CEO who can't put together a coherent sentence, much less spell "coherent"?

Not plausible in the least. It is a very obvious scam.