News Focus
News Focus
Followers 26
Posts 5588
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/07/2010

Re: Carog post# 91965

Wednesday, 07/01/2015 4:53:47 PM

Wednesday, July 01, 2015 4:53:47 PM

Post# of 163761
"Why dont you that complain put together your own dividend policy and let the board analyze it given the fundamentals of the company and we can see what you come up with."

Carog--Unless the five year plan was a piece of fluff that he never intended to carry out, Solomon thought five years ago when SIAF was in it's true infancy, when they held almost nothing but the dairy, that he could manage 8% of earnings as a dividend. It's ridiculous to think that the company is incapable of that now no matter how many moving parts. I don't care if SIAF is a growth company, 8% is nothing and providing it would mean that they were at least belatedly keeping their word. First they said the 8% could not be provided over the last five years because of depressed Chinese equity prices, but the expectation was that when the five year plan was completed, they would return to the original dividend plan. In the meantime most shareholders remained loyal to the company under the most exigent circumstances when the price seemed to do nothing but go down. Some people like me invested large sums of money in this company years ago on the dividend expectation as I knew I would be reaching retirement age. To see now that the company is not providing what it promised when it clearly has that capability is shameful. I have no other way to put it. It seems SIAF is taking advantage of the fact that there are many new shareholders to whom that promise was never made directly, but I'd like to remind the company that there are many long-timers here still who remember what was said.

With all due respect, I think you are cheerleading when you conclude that the lateness of the dividend announcement means that there were forces pro and con a substantial dividend. This is exactly how myths are born, and we don't need that here. There has been enough of that already. There is uncertainty about the reason for the lateness of the PR, but it's not good to project into that vacuum an understanding that is favorable to our interests as fact. There are any number of reasons why it might have been late: 1) Solomon was traveling 2) Everyone forgot 3) No one particularly cares about observing timelines 4) EC was unavailable to consult 5) they were debating a 1% or 2% payout, etc. The history of this company is that over-believing is destructive to one's health.

Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today