InvestorsHub Logo

dfh

Followers 2
Posts 1589
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/30/2000

dfh

Member Level

Re: Caradoc post# 13202

Friday, 05/05/2006 10:47:37 PM

Friday, May 05, 2006 10:47:37 PM

Post# of 23712
Hi Caradoc, always glad to see you here. As for PT's technology and FF's, this is my brief take on both.
Snaper had an excellent idea, using metal foam as a battery plate. Mathematically, he also figured the optimum configuration - dodecahedral.
However, neither proved achievable with present day technology.
Fortunately, Elod came up with a workable solution. Not totally unique mind you but he was able to put together different known technologies into what we have today, a RVC substrate plated with a lead/tin alloy, framed and tabbed.

As for FF's, it appears to me that they have been trying to do a work around on our design. That can be seen from their many design changes over the years. They cite using a pasted graphite substrate. Graphite being a better conductor than plain vitreous carbon but with its own inherent problems such as being soft and brittle. IMO they also lack some necessary items that PT has of which I won't go into here. I believe that's why they cite their battery as being another 1 1/2 years out.
I'll call you if you like on further specifics.
Don