Dutch Gold Resources Inc. (fka DGRI)

[thecrusher2011]

"IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT Plaintiff's motion is GRANTED, and Defendant is liable to Plaintiff in the amount of $246,264.00"

The Defendant was "Dutch Gold Resources" not "Dutch Gold Mining" I don't understand why this is confusing.

Dutch Gold Resources is not in bankruptcy, Dutch Gold Mining is in bankruptcy.

You stated

If they sued the parent company, they sued the wrong company.

There is no "if" here, they did sue the parent company and they won.

Secondly, If that were true then DGRI would have shown up to defend the case and filed to have it thrown out.

The facts are that there was a convertible note signed between Coventry and Dutch Gold Resources and DGRI did not honor their obligation, that is why they were sued. DGRI is both guilty and broke which is why they did not defend the action.



Hope this helps.