Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:14:54 PM
I appreciate the math, but obviously we both agree the Pilot is not to produce saleable product. It is to demonstrate ERC performance based on a specific concentration of C02 and cost to produce the desired output (whatever is setup as output on any given day since that can be variable) and demonstrate that at levels that can be projected for a full scale ERC unit.
And while I also want specific answers to your question, output is dependent on the purity of the C02 fed into the ERC (different by industry). And outputs of course can be different (formic acid, syngas, etc).
Now the question you have touched on that is most relevant for me, is the licensing fees. Regardless of what ERC exists anywhere, and regardless of what is the input or the output, what are the general licensing fees?
It is still early for some of that information, in fact I think any company might keep that close to the vest until forced to reveal it. I think it would be good to revisit this question after the Pilot Plant launch. That should tell Lafarge and us (as investors) a lot more. Same is true with the brewery.
Also, it should be noted that (based on my understanding) that Christina Gyenge joined MVTG specifically to focus on compiling and documenting exactly this type of data needed for full scale commercialization. So MVTG is obviously focused on these details.
And while I also want specific answers to your question, output is dependent on the purity of the C02 fed into the ERC (different by industry). And outputs of course can be different (formic acid, syngas, etc).
Now the question you have touched on that is most relevant for me, is the licensing fees. Regardless of what ERC exists anywhere, and regardless of what is the input or the output, what are the general licensing fees?
It is still early for some of that information, in fact I think any company might keep that close to the vest until forced to reveal it. I think it would be good to revisit this question after the Pilot Plant launch. That should tell Lafarge and us (as investors) a lot more. Same is true with the brewery.
Also, it should be noted that (based on my understanding) that Christina Gyenge joined MVTG specifically to focus on compiling and documenting exactly this type of data needed for full scale commercialization. So MVTG is obviously focused on these details.
Recent HWNI News
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 05:48:50 PM
- Form DEF 14C - Other definitive information statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/30/2026 05:46:13 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/23/2026 06:30:14 PM
- Form PRE 14C - Other preliminary information statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/20/2026 03:21:38 PM
- Form SC 14F1 - Statement regarding change in majority of directors [Rule 14f-1] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/11/2026 05:46:10 PM
- Form SCHEDULE 13D - General Statement of Acquisition of Beneficial Ownership • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/09/2026 10:16:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/06/2026 06:34:43 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:02:19 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 08:32:50 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 08:30:41 PM
- Form SCHEDULE 13G - Statement of Beneficial Ownership by Certain Investors • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/10/2025 08:05:16 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/29/2025 08:32:51 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/13/2025 09:04:09 PM
- Form S-1/A - General form for registration of securities under the Securities Act of 1933: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/08/2025 08:16:23 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 05/05/2025 08:39:28 PM
