>>I am waiting on District Judge Richard Sullivan's opinion relating to the JPMCB lien on LBHI collateral: $6.9B.
<<
Absolutely nothing nothing to do with the CTs. You can't take words out of context such as "securities", "securities transaction", "guarantee", "JPMorgan", "Lehman", etc, and just because those words also show up in the CT prospectus, insert yourself as a CT holder in every situation that mentions them thinking you are going to get paid.
Your DD on the POR distributions was flawed, you DD here is too.
As JPM itself said;
[img]
i92.photobucket.com/albums/l34/dirfie/cliamresponse_zpsbab56fb1.jpg[/img]