InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[jmspaesq]

Danny:You're Pretty Darned Smart IMHO

And you're exactly right: It isn't the way they're voting, it is the way they went about the PR. If they didn't have some hidden agenda, why would they operate this way?

What has been divisive? Lots of us have disagree agreeably about this issue. What's been divisive is the sneaky underhanded way they went about what they did. And misrepresented US from this board--it was a violation, not of law but of what's right.

There's a way to do things. And this was done all wrong. And that's the problem, not venom from the yeses or the nos. It is the distrust that they have sown. Whatever their agenda is the result of the way they went about pursuing it is what left hard feelings.

Absolutely--they have a right to their opinions and you and I and others would defend that right. But who could defend how they went about it? I haven't really had a problem with any NO voter because I think they should vote NO if they think that's right. But I have a problem with whoever did this--group or single person, whoever, whyever.

jmho joel