I disagree with your opinion.
* If the Litigation results were so CRYSTAL CLEAR? Than how come the litigation results give no mention of the (BIHC) prior to the year 2009? It is CRYSTAL CLEAR to me though that BIHC was changed from ticker symbol PRSU.pk in which numerous public posts were issued, and not one of which was regarded in your BIHC stock opinion. Crystal Clear would be explaining to investors of BIHC stock what happened to PRSU.PK stock back in 2007 before BIHC stock had the Transfer Agent change the Ticker symbol in INVESTORS accounts in my opinion. I am not asking for BIHC STOCK to turn the symbol back to PRSU.PK (PRIME RESTAURANT INC), i am asking you why you regard the litigation as being Crystal clear, when obviously half the company is missing in your LITIGATION report in my opinion of speculations........ I bought PRSU.PK stock back in 2007 where did it go, your litigation report only deals with BIHC stock, and the dates that are mentioned wherein....What about Prior Dates RENEE? For exmaple, everybody talks about CRIS GALO and ED H. What ever happened to INGALA and KUSHNER in regards to the public posts made with PRSU.PK stock? What about those public posts to shareholders??? No mention of their names or the company???
ANd Renee, the fact that this company traded one time after shareholders were locked out is deplorable in my opinion of speculations, but you have 14 separate acts which you regard as no big deal because the volume was small????? As an investor it looks like MM's were acting on something maybe they should not have maybe? 14 times they Traded while Investors were locked out, volume was small you say so it was not worthwhile??? Was over ONE MILLION SHARES traded Renee while investors are locked out? WHo are U to say what is High or Small Volume, when NO volume is supposed to be the NORM? Just my own opinions of speculations.....
Just my own opinions of speculations only, i get my ideas from Lippy the Lion and Grape Ape who combined together with the Wonder Twins and GLeek, for educated opinions of speculations only using hypothesis for explaining the solution to the problem ma