AI
Thursday, August 07, 2014 1:16:42 PM
Yeah, that would be groundbreaking because would have told us the drug and 30% of our pipeline was bunk.
I welcome your disagreement but I've been in this stock for as long or longer than most and I've read dozens of PRs which drive the SP down because there is no tangible or actionable information.
Obviously, this isn't one of them. This is great news. My point is perhaps we should treat it as such. Leo is just bad a sharing good news.
Do you remember when the p21 marker results were "announced" at that conference a year ago? It's the news we longs had waited for for months and it slipped out like a wet fart and he back peddled immediately saying they results we inconclusive. That was over a year ago and there hasn't been movement on that front since. I'm just tired of good news being treated like the same mundane trash that gets PRed constantly like the ever increasing potential market value of B, a potentially potent drug that might potentially enroll it's full cohort which could potentially make us all rich. That's not news that hypothetical conjecture and to put that changing number in no less than 4 PRs is, wait for it, FLUFF.
I think this board should be a place for healthy criticism of the company we put our money in. I don't think people need to swoop in to defend CTIX and Leo's honor every time someone expresses a negative thought. He's a big boy and he's playing with my money.
I think a little criticism is due for a company that's down 20% since the start of year in a market that is up significantly even after the recent pull back.
I'm not alone in my criticism and I don't think you can lump all of us longs in your opinion. I am and have been long CTIX since I bought in around 70 cents and I've watched some of the company's longest and loudest table pounders sell and leave because they too got frustrated.
Please forgive my perpetual negativity and I'll forgive your perpetual table pounding.
I welcome your disagreement but I've been in this stock for as long or longer than most and I've read dozens of PRs which drive the SP down because there is no tangible or actionable information.
Obviously, this isn't one of them. This is great news. My point is perhaps we should treat it as such. Leo is just bad a sharing good news.
Do you remember when the p21 marker results were "announced" at that conference a year ago? It's the news we longs had waited for for months and it slipped out like a wet fart and he back peddled immediately saying they results we inconclusive. That was over a year ago and there hasn't been movement on that front since. I'm just tired of good news being treated like the same mundane trash that gets PRed constantly like the ever increasing potential market value of B, a potentially potent drug that might potentially enroll it's full cohort which could potentially make us all rich. That's not news that hypothetical conjecture and to put that changing number in no less than 4 PRs is, wait for it, FLUFF.
I think this board should be a place for healthy criticism of the company we put our money in. I don't think people need to swoop in to defend CTIX and Leo's honor every time someone expresses a negative thought. He's a big boy and he's playing with my money.
I think a little criticism is due for a company that's down 20% since the start of year in a market that is up significantly even after the recent pull back.
I'm not alone in my criticism and I don't think you can lump all of us longs in your opinion. I am and have been long CTIX since I bought in around 70 cents and I've watched some of the company's longest and loudest table pounders sell and leave because they too got frustrated.
Please forgive my perpetual negativity and I'll forgive your perpetual table pounding.
