Foreign Correspondence

[otraque]

i will have to wait on this, as even Muqtada al Sadr has doubts about whether Iraqis are plunging into a civil war as the most recent comment i have noted, about a week old from Sadr, was if we are in a civil it is our civil war, and the U.S. can just get out of here.
But i will intrude here and say Ahmadinejad can see the U.S. has ALREADY bitten off more than they can handle.
I think Iran can see a scenario that if they can draw the U.S. into invading Iran, the U.S. will be beaten. Yes, beaten.
if Bush persists in his lunacy he will break this country.
But i also can see Bush, this madman, if perceiving a beaten situation would resort to nuclear weapons.
i will stick to my conjecture that Bush is the single most dangerous man to ever to be POTUS, he is MORE dangerous to the U.S.A than Ahmadinejad by a long shot.
i remind that Bush, per sources inside, does not feel the pain and suffering of the dead americans nor Iraqis, that , as the source said "Bush feels NO pain about any of this. He believes in the idea 'Pain and suffering ADVANCES the church.', or in this case his paranoic cause to destroy our enemies--like they could really do that.
That is why i feel , as long as Bush and the like of mind , are in control, the U.S. is moving to its own destruction.
Those that support Bush are supporting the downfall of the U.S.A.
How evil is a man, that can spends billions and billions and billions to destroy Iraq, and turn his back on NOLA.
How evil is a man that will give all to guns and empty the shelves of butter.
How long will it take for the ordinary american to say "he is evil".
Well given many Germans could never, even after WWII could not bring themselves to say Hitler was evil, the same will be for Bush.
The biggest difference in me and you GC, is i believe there are truly evil people, and they will remain so and will destroy this world-- they be unchangeable and are always present, you do not believe this.
That is are biggest difference.Max