Tuesday, May 27, 2003 8:09:17 AM
rmarchma .. First a sell decision should not always be based on one factor, such as one’s judgment of management’s abilities and capabilities.
That is such an obvious and fundamental principle of sound investing I'm curious as to why you felt the need to state it in your post.
Therefore, my decision to sell will be based not upon my assessment of management, but upon my assessment of the underlying technology.
Didn't you just contradict yourself here? You're now saying that your sell decision will be based upon an assessment of a single factor, "the underlying technology."
Up until your post, I have not known of a single individual or institutional investor that was willing to put such a low weight on their assessment of top management in deciding when to sell. After all, the "underlying technology" does not have a mandate to build shareholder value, management does. I don't agree with a lot of what is said here about IDCC management, but I sure do think it is right and proper for each and every one of us to spend a lot of time trying to assess whether top management is capable of building a highly successful company or not.
It is hard for me to imagine an instance where the clear majority of the shareholders gives less than a 50% weight to their assessment of management in their decision to sell. If most of IDCC shareholders, particularly the institutional ones, are giving substantial weight to their assessment of management in their DD and you are not it seems to me that you are playing pretty high stakes investing poker. In the instance where most of them conclude that management is not going to be able to adequately build shareholder value relative to an alternative investment don't you run the risk of being left holding the bag when they sell out?
Just to add to your risk here, you correctly stated in an earlier post that institutions don't stick around long when they've decided that they can do better in some other stock. The good news on the increasing institutional ownership is that it is driving the stock price up. The bad news is if they turn sour on IDCC pretty much simultaneously (a frequent occurrence with institutions) they will trample most of us here while we try to find the exit door. Call me crazy but I sure would like to have my management assessment weighting pretty much aligned with theirs so I can increase my odds of selling before they do.
That is such an obvious and fundamental principle of sound investing I'm curious as to why you felt the need to state it in your post.
Therefore, my decision to sell will be based not upon my assessment of management, but upon my assessment of the underlying technology.
Didn't you just contradict yourself here? You're now saying that your sell decision will be based upon an assessment of a single factor, "the underlying technology."
Up until your post, I have not known of a single individual or institutional investor that was willing to put such a low weight on their assessment of top management in deciding when to sell. After all, the "underlying technology" does not have a mandate to build shareholder value, management does. I don't agree with a lot of what is said here about IDCC management, but I sure do think it is right and proper for each and every one of us to spend a lot of time trying to assess whether top management is capable of building a highly successful company or not.
It is hard for me to imagine an instance where the clear majority of the shareholders gives less than a 50% weight to their assessment of management in their decision to sell. If most of IDCC shareholders, particularly the institutional ones, are giving substantial weight to their assessment of management in their DD and you are not it seems to me that you are playing pretty high stakes investing poker. In the instance where most of them conclude that management is not going to be able to adequately build shareholder value relative to an alternative investment don't you run the risk of being left holding the bag when they sell out?
Just to add to your risk here, you correctly stated in an earlier post that institutions don't stick around long when they've decided that they can do better in some other stock. The good news on the increasing institutional ownership is that it is driving the stock price up. The bad news is if they turn sour on IDCC pretty much simultaneously (a frequent occurrence with institutions) they will trample most of us here while we try to find the exit door. Call me crazy but I sure would like to have my management assessment weighting pretty much aligned with theirs so I can increase my odds of selling before they do.
Recent IDCC News
- Form SCHEDULE 13G/A - Statement of Beneficial Ownership by Certain Investors: [Amend] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 08:11:55 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 11:00:56 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:59:52 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:59:12 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:58:36 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:56:57 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:56:23 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:55:47 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/24/2026 10:54:42 AM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/20/2026 08:30:51 PM
- InterDigital’s NAB Showcase to Spotlight HDR Innovation for Advanced and Ad-Supported Streaming • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/16/2026 12:00:00 PM
- AI-enabled Pixel Value Reduction curbs energy use and extends video viewing by up to 22% • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/15/2026 12:00:00 PM
- InterDigital Announces Date for First Quarter 2026 Financial Results • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/14/2026 12:30:00 PM
- InterDigital’s Michael Starsinic Elected Vice Chair of 3GPP SA2 • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/14/2026 08:00:00 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 12:34:53 PM
- Form 144 - Report of proposed sale of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/06/2026 08:05:41 PM
- At 6G@UT Forum, InterDigital to Demonstrate AI-enabled Teleoperation and Energy Efficient Edge Intelligence • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/06/2026 08:00:00 AM
- InterDigital signs license agreement with Buffalo Americas; adds new DTV agreements • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/02/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:29:02 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:27:43 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/02/2026 10:26:12 AM
- InterDigital awarded injunction against Transsion • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 04/01/2026 12:30:00 PM
- InterDigital Declares Regular Quarterly Cash Dividend • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/24/2026 08:30:00 PM
- Agentic AI Will Make Uplink the Next Mobile Bottleneck • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 03/18/2026 08:00:00 AM
- Form 4 - Statement of changes in beneficial ownership of securities • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/17/2026 09:23:51 PM
