InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 52
Posts 6542
Boards Moderated 3
Alias Born 01/02/2003

Re: Danny Detail post# 28277

Sunday, 05/25/2003 6:44:39 PM

Sunday, May 25, 2003 6:44:39 PM

Post# of 433131
Danny, "What I do know is that professional money managers do not like to own stocks where they perceive there is a significant chance of protracted shareholder unrest"

That would also apply to mom and pop shareholders too.

The lobbying group is an interesting sideline feature but doesn't distract my views from the bigger picture. Idcc needs to learn how to produce. Currently they're talking the talk, in the past that amounted to sales tax returns when most were expecting the larger returns the company was hinting at. You know a wink here a wink there, hockey stick and the like. They need Nok/Sam to be resolved as they have presented it will be resolved. No back tracking on this one, and no wiggle room should be given.

The problem I have with that is Nokia and just how easy will they roll over. Another factor is I just don't see what the penalty would be for Nokia not to drag this through arbitration. What would they lose? And if they don't have the incentive to speed along so to speak does that mean IDCC will have to offer a new deal to get them on board within their timetable.

Frankly If I was Nokia that’s what I would do.I'd wait them out. And I certainly wouldn't be in a rush to fork over 100 plus million

In any event they need to get that done, wrapped, and finished. Everything else is minor. Including the options.

Volume:
Day Range:
Bid:
Ask:
Last Trade Time:
Total Trades:
  • 1D
  • 1M
  • 3M
  • 6M
  • 1Y
  • 5Y
Recent IDCC News