News Focus
News Focus
Followers 48
Posts 4768
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 07/26/2010

Re: gistheman post# 55

Sunday, 07/06/2014 10:52:42 AM

Sunday, July 06, 2014 10:52:42 AM

Post# of 207
Without a clarification of why that price was paid, I would assume it is a pump to inflate the stock price

I see nothing in the all data chart that would support any pump or dump theories at anytime in the past 7 years?

http://bigcharts.marketwatch.com/quickchart/quickchart.asp?symb=gpiw&insttype=&freq=2&show=&time=20

1. No artificial pps hike at time of merge proceedings 2012/2013?

2. No dump-off in the several months this stock traded recently at .80 to 1.00?

3. The most recent quarterly loss filing is no way to advance an upcoming pump & dump. In fact, it was this recent reported eps loss that legitimized the stock for me. The subsequent (probable retail) selling down to pps .30 brought me in.

All that said, one must place a risk-factor on any penny stock just for it's existence in pennyland. The filing link below contains the Hong Kong and Tokyo numbers and email addresses if anyone wants to put in the time for more serious dd clarification?

http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=GPIW&id=114270



Discover What Traders Are Watching

Explore small cap ideas before they hit the headlines.

Join Today