InterDigital Inc (IDCC)

[olddog967]

bim: Although domestic industry for two of the three patents was previously ruled upon, because of an ITC criteria change, it again is a matter of dispute. The following regarding domestic industry was from the parties "JOINT OUTLINE OF THE ISSUES TO BE DECIDED IN THE FINAL INITIAL DETERMINATION".

U.S. PATENT NO. 7,941,151

Domestic Industry – “Technical Prong”
See Section I.C.3 of Complainant’s Posthearing Brief, Section V.F of Respondents’ Posthearing Brief, and Section V.D of Staff’s Posthearing Brief.

1. Whether an Article Practices the Claims of the 151 Patent

------

U.S. PATENT NO. 7,190,966

Domestic Industry – “Technical Prong”
See Section I.C.3 of Complainant’s Posthearing Brief, Section V.F of Respondents’ Posthearing Brief, and Section V.D of Staff’s Posthearing Brief.

1. Whether an Article Practices the Claims of the 966 Patent

--------

U.S. PATENT NO. 7,286,847

Domestic Industry – “Technical Prong”
See Section I.C.3 of Complainant’s Posthearing Brief, Section V.F of Respondents’ Posthearing Brief, and Section VI.D of Staff’s Posthearing Brief.

1. Whether an Article Practices the Claims of the 847 Patent

------------

DOMESTIC INDUSTRY UNDER SECTION 337(a)(3)(C)

See Section I.E of Complainant’s Posthearing Brief, Section VI of Respondents’ Posthearing Brief, and Section VII of Staff’s Posthearing Brief.


Domestic Industry Based on Licensing

1. Whether InterDigital has Satisfied the Domestic Industry Requirement Based on Investments by InterDigital in Licensing Under Section 337(a)(3)(C)

Domestic Industry Based on R&D

1. Whether InterDigital has Satisfied the Domestic Industry Requirement Based on Investments by InterDigital in Research and Development Under Section 337(a)(3)(C)