Wednesday, May 28, 2014 2:59:06 PM
I'm pretty sure that even in one tumor lump, you will find more than one phenotype of tumor cells. Since these patients have gone thru more than one round of treatment, the remaining phenotype of tumor cells are highly resistant to chemo. The most resistant of these phenotype will be the germ/stem cell cd34+ line. the phenotypes become less resistant as they mature and change into differentitated cells. Each of the tumor lumps all started out with one migrating germ/stem cell that metastasized. But the hypothesis is that each lump should be very similar to one another. I'm not sure if the DCVAX Direct individual doses are injected into the same lump each time (which I think is the protocol for now) but I'm wondering if LP is suggesting each time a different lump will be injected. I really don't think it will make much of a difference. But I really wish that NWBO will let someone like Dr. Marnix Bosch to speak since he has a science background. Who is making the decisions in the direction of these trials? I hope it isn't LP.
Also, I sometimes wonder if there was a significant change in the quality of the process used in PI studies by Dr. Linda Liau and the pIII studies in GBM. With personalized treatments, I'd be concerned by the ability to have consistent processes which the pIII trial is utilizing but I'm pretty sure that Dr. Linda Liau used a slightly different process which involved fresher cells and less processing time because there was no need for shipping blood and tissue samples. Will these differences make a significant impact on results? I don't know but the pI results for IMUC and NWBO were both very good, but both were based on one clinical site with a slightly different protocol that had to be altered to adapt to a larger clinical trial with a centralized processing center. One would hope that is not the case, but my first hand experience dealing with blood and isolating stem cells and freezing cells in dmso and cell viability is partly dependent on the handler's skills and time. This may be part of the reason Big Pharma for the most part tries to avoid these type of therapies.
Also, I sometimes wonder if there was a significant change in the quality of the process used in PI studies by Dr. Linda Liau and the pIII studies in GBM. With personalized treatments, I'd be concerned by the ability to have consistent processes which the pIII trial is utilizing but I'm pretty sure that Dr. Linda Liau used a slightly different process which involved fresher cells and less processing time because there was no need for shipping blood and tissue samples. Will these differences make a significant impact on results? I don't know but the pI results for IMUC and NWBO were both very good, but both were based on one clinical site with a slightly different protocol that had to be altered to adapt to a larger clinical trial with a centralized processing center. One would hope that is not the case, but my first hand experience dealing with blood and isolating stem cells and freezing cells in dmso and cell viability is partly dependent on the handler's skills and time. This may be part of the reason Big Pharma for the most part tries to avoid these type of therapies.
Recent NWBO News
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • InvestorsHub NewsWire • 05/11/2026 01:00:00 PM
- CNS Drug Delivery Breakthroughs Unlock Significant Biotech Market Opportunities • GlobeNewswire Inc. • 05/11/2026 12:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:38:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Appoints Dr. Annalisa Jenkins As Strategic Adviser To Advance Dendritic Cell Cancer Vaccine Platform • PR Newswire (US) • 04/30/2026 04:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Northwest Biotherapeutics Announces Establishment Of the Company's Own Dedicated Leukapheresis Clinic • PR Newswire (US) • 04/21/2026 01:30:00 PM
- Form EFFECT - Notice of Effectiveness • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/21/2026 04:15:08 AM
- Form POS AM - Post-Effective amendments for registration statement • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/16/2026 09:25:30 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 04/07/2026 04:30:50 PM
- Form NT 10-K - Notification of inability to timely file Form 10-K 405, 10-K, 10-KSB 405, 10-KSB, 10-KT, or 10-KT405 • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 03/31/2026 09:04:37 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/15/2026 10:06:20 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 01/02/2026 10:14:59 PM
- Form DEF 14A - Other definitive proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/28/2025 09:43:27 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/25/2025 10:23:07 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/20/2025 09:26:03 PM
- Form PRE 14A - Other preliminary proxy statements • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/19/2025 09:15:48 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 11/14/2025 09:44:21 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/31/2025 04:29:10 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/30/2025 08:40:05 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/24/2025 04:28:38 PM
- Form 8-K - Current report • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 10/14/2025 06:22:26 PM
- Form 10-Q - Quarterly report [Sections 13 or 15(d)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 08/14/2025 09:00:38 PM
- Form 424B5 - Prospectus [Rule 424(b)(5)] • Edgar (US Regulatory) • 07/01/2025 09:04:38 PM
