Jail, i think the aggregate deal was could be profitable, if they was can do this parallel to the goldproduction. So it was an extra income, excluding to the income from the gold production.
But the company never told us, that they can do only this or this. NEVER.
And it´s not very clever to bring the goldproduction down from 18k ounces per quarter to 400 ounces per quarter, only that you can produce aggregates for your "friendly neighbour".
I have told this Fifer in several times, but he wouldn´t understand this and he say this helps him to bring down his cashcosts. But when you look to the cashcosts from the second quarter, then you will understand that exactly the opposite is true. We was have there cashcosts over 1.400 USD per ounce.
When i told him this and want the explantation about this, i was never get an answer, why he has then cashcosts from 1.400 USD with aggregate production, when he was have before only cashcosts from 500-600 USD without aggregate......