InvestorsHub Logo
Followers 8
Posts 1510
Boards Moderated 0
Alias Born 03/19/2007

Re: dolphinsmike post# 52700

Wednesday, 05/14/2014 10:08:01 AM

Wednesday, May 14, 2014 10:08:01 AM

Post# of 68424
O' come on now...lets take a look at 2013-5/2014 for one person John Engleman (Director)

31-Mar-14-9,375-VRNG-Automatic Sale at $3.49 per share (Proceeds of $32,718)
3-Jan-14-9,375-VRNG-Sale at $2.96 per share (Proceeds of $27,750)
30-Sep-13-9,375-VRNG-Sale at $2.88 per share-(Proceeds of $27,000)
26-Apr-13-9,375-VRNG-Sale at $2.87 per share-(Proceeds of $26,906)
28-Jan-13-18,750-VRNG -Sale at $3.22 per share-(Proceeds of $60,375)

He sold 56,250 shares for $174,749. Big deal he still owns as of 3/31/2014 205,326 shares worth at todays market $640+k.

Could you tell me if you owned as a director you wouldn't sell anything just to prove some point to investors? I'm not trying to argue with you I just don't see it the way you do. I don't feel any company officer especially a small stock like VRNG should have to be required to hold his stock just to appease an investor. In some small way he is doing exactly what every other investor should've or should be doing.

PLAYING the stock.