the big question about wave is its cash flow, of which development costs are a major element.
revenues can solve wave's problems, but it needs to have them (net of costs) in order build its business.
the problem wave has had is that revenues have been insufficient to balance development costs.
can solms solve this problem?
wave, if it appears to be a going concern, can establish a value that isn't focussed on the high risk of insolvency.
ie if the pattern of future revenues is clarified, the stock price has a better chance of sustaining an increase.
it would be nice if solms could indicate the income implications in wave's transactions.
one can add development opportunities forever. it matters to most investors who is going to pay for them and whether they will deliver a return on a sane timescale.