Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Has FCEL asked for an extension to regain compliance ?
Yea, I don't understand losing $14,000 and only getting back $364. Doesn't sit right with me.
Well, shouldn't a lawsuit be filed asap before there's absolutely no money to recoup via a class action lawsuit.
https://tcr.sec.gov/TcrExternalWeb/faces/pages/accept.jspx
Anyone else receive a legal letter via email from Rockley today?
I have no idea what it means, I don't speak legalese.
What does this mean?
The Department of Justice is reportedly exploring if they can charge stock market short-sellers with the same law used to take down the mafia
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-short-sellers-doj-investigation-mafia-law-rico-racketeering-2022-2
Matthew Fox
Wed, February 23, 2022, 2:15 PM·
The Department of Justice is exploring if they can charge stock market short-sellers with the same law used to prosecute the mafia, according to a Reuters report.
Several short-selling research firms have been on the DOJ's radar as they investigate illegal trading tactics.
Subpoenas have been sent to dozens of firms, including Citron Research and Muddy Waters.
An ongoing investigation into the practices of several stock market short-sellers is heating up, and the Department of Justice is exploring if it can use a federal law that was originally enacted to prosecute the mafia, according to a Reuters report.
The Justice Department already sent subpoenas to dozens of short-selling firms last year, including high-profile activists Andrew Left of Citron Research and Carson Block of Muddy Waters.
While no final decision has been made by prosecutors, potential charges under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, remain an option "on the table," Reuters reported, citing two sources familiar with the situation.
This wouldn't be the first time RICO charges were leveled against Wall Street participants. In the 1980s, Michael Milken was charged with racketeering, though he reached a plea deal that did not include those charges. And in 2019, JPMorgan executives were charged with racketeering related to the price manipulation of precious metals.
The current investigation into short-sellers revolves around their trading practices, specifically whether manipulative tactics were employed around the same time a negative report was published.
According to prior reports, the DOJ seized hardware, trading records, and private messages from various short-sellers and is focused on the act of "spoofing" and "scalping," two practices that could lead to big gains for traders.
Spoofing is an illegal practice banned in 2010 in which a trader floods the market with fake orders to influence a stock price. Scalping is related to activist short-sellers selling out of their position for profits without disclosing it.
Short-sellers are an unloved group of market participants that get a lot of blowback from the companies they target and the investors of those companies. Some see their tactics as predatory, as they often have the power to move a stock that they might have a position in by releasing a critical report. Critics say these reports use misleading information that doesn't give a complete picture of the situation at hand.
But some short-sellers also have a proven track record of identifying and exposing fraudulent companies that sometimes go bankrupt. Such companies that were the target of short-seller research included Enron, Sino-Forest, and Wirecard AG, among others.
One person who is happy with the Justice Department's investigation is Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
"I am greatly encouraged by the Justice Department investigating short sellers. This is something the SEC should have done, but, curiously, did not," Musk said in an e-mail to CNBC. "They will short a company, conduct a negative publicity campaign to drive the stock price down temporarily and cash out, then do it all over again many times."
Musk's position against short-sellers is not surprising given that Tesla stock was a popular target among short-sellers for many years until it broke out to record highs in late 2019 as the EV maker turned a profit. While 25% of Tesla's shares were sold short in 2019, that figure now stands at just 2%, according to data from Koyfin.
So far, the investigation by the Justice Department has reached nearly 30 investment and research firms that engage in short-selling. No one has been accused of wrongdoing, and the investigation may not lead to charges being brought.
The Department of Justice is reportedly exploring if they can charge stock market short-sellers with the same law used to take down the mafia
https://markets.businessinsider.com/news/stocks/stock-market-short-sellers-doj-investigation-mafia-law-rico-racketeering-2022-2
Matthew Fox
Wed, February 23, 2022, 2:15 PM·
The Department of Justice is exploring if they can charge stock market short-sellers with the same law used to prosecute the mafia, according to a Reuters report.
Several short-selling research firms have been on the DOJ's radar as they investigate illegal trading tactics.
Subpoenas have been sent to dozens of firms, including Citron Research and Muddy Waters.
An ongoing investigation into the practices of several stock market short-sellers is heating up, and the Department of Justice is exploring if it can use a federal law that was originally enacted to prosecute the mafia, according to a Reuters report.
The Justice Department already sent subpoenas to dozens of short-selling firms last year, including high-profile activists Andrew Left of Citron Research and Carson Block of Muddy Waters.
While no final decision has been made by prosecutors, potential charges under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act, or RICO, remain an option "on the table," Reuters reported, citing two sources familiar with the situation.
This wouldn't be the first time RICO charges were leveled against Wall Street participants. In the 1980s, Michael Milken was charged with racketeering, though he reached a plea deal that did not include those charges. And in 2019, JPMorgan executives were charged with racketeering related to the price manipulation of precious metals.
The current investigation into short-sellers revolves around their trading practices, specifically whether manipulative tactics were employed around the same time a negative report was published.
According to prior reports, the DOJ seized hardware, trading records, and private messages from various short-sellers and is focused on the act of "spoofing" and "scalping," two practices that could lead to big gains for traders.
Spoofing is an illegal practice banned in 2010 in which a trader floods the market with fake orders to influence a stock price. Scalping is related to activist short-sellers selling out of their position for profits without disclosing it.
Short-sellers are an unloved group of market participants that get a lot of blowback from the companies they target and the investors of those companies. Some see their tactics as predatory, as they often have the power to move a stock that they might have a position in by releasing a critical report. Critics say these reports use misleading information that doesn't give a complete picture of the situation at hand.
But some short-sellers also have a proven track record of identifying and exposing fraudulent companies that sometimes go bankrupt. Such companies that were the target of short-seller research included Enron, Sino-Forest, and Wirecard AG, among others.
One person who is happy with the Justice Department's investigation is Tesla CEO Elon Musk.
"I am greatly encouraged by the Justice Department investigating short sellers. This is something the SEC should have done, but, curiously, did not," Musk said in an e-mail to CNBC. "They will short a company, conduct a negative publicity campaign to drive the stock price down temporarily and cash out, then do it all over again many times."
Musk's position against short-sellers is not surprising given that Tesla stock was a popular target among short-sellers for many years until it broke out to record highs in late 2019 as the EV maker turned a profit. While 25% of Tesla's shares were sold short in 2019, that figure now stands at just 2%, according to data from Koyfin.
So far, the investigation by the Justice Department has reached nearly 30 investment and research firms that engage in short-selling. No one has been accused of wrongdoing, and the investigation may not lead to charges being brought.
For those who have a better understanding of what's going on with NOK, what are the next catalyst that could move the pps upward.
Thank you in advance.
Looks like the hearing has been moved yet again.
https://nok.listedcompany.com/newsroom/060920212152140211E.pdf
ayejayone,
in your opinion how soon do you think NOKPF can resolve the current issue's with their debt rehab plan and the release of financials.
Tia
Inside the race to find a COVID-19 treatment pill
https://www.yahoo.com/news/inside-race-covid-19-treatment-100306046.html
Been looking to get into POET but the only thing holding me back is the possibility of a RS.
Question for you investors that have a better read on this stock. Do you think a RS will be necessary?
TYIA
Well if the SEC is really going after toxic lenders and their shady ways then hopefully the judge / court rules in ways that allow OW & shareholders survive and ultimately succeed.
SEC’s Crackdown on OTC Markets’ Toxic Lenders Should NOT Spell The End for Microcap Companies
The proverbial shit has hit the fan on the over-the-counter (OTC) markets, leaving many microcap companies in a very precarious situation.
For quite some time now, the SEC has been targeting so-called penny stock financiers (aka “Toxic Lenders”), most of whom are ultimately responsible for the type of toxic financing that could be tried as an accessory to the murder of a microcap company’s potential.
Dropping like flies
In late 2017, the SEC brought an enforcement action against Ibrahim Almagarby and his company Microcap Equity Group LLC (“Microcap Equity”) for engaging in the sale of billions of shares of numerous penny stock issuers, while allegedly acting as an unregistered dealer.
Brokers and dealers are required to register under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) to protect public companies of all sizes, including microcap businesses. Operating unregistered has allowed many of these financiers to skip regulatory obligations, such as regulatory inspections and oversight, financial responsibility requirements, and maintaining proper books and ...........
https://www.regaboost.com/post/sec-s-crackdown-on-otc-markets-toxic-lenders-should-not-spell-the-end-for-microcap-companies
To approve the amendment of the FuelCell Energy, Inc. Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock of FuelCell Energy, Inc. from 337,500,000 shares to 500,000,000 shares (the “Increase Authorized Shares Proposal”);
http://archive.fast-edgar.com/20210219/AQBZNG2C8M22UZZK222C2ZZZP8ELZ2Q2ZL32/
jd757 nice post!
Love this quote, "next 3 months and, with a 90% probability hold a price between $102.61 and $140.41 at the end of this 3-month period."
Elon Musk says he will give $100 million to whoever creates the best carbon capture technology
Elon Musk said Thursday he'll give $100 million as a prize for the "best carbon capture technology."
Musk recently asked for tips on where to donate his wealth, of which he has promised to give away half.
Carbon capture is likely to play a major role in Biden's plans for addressing climate change.
Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk teased his latest philanthropic endeavor on Thursday: a contest aimed at encouraging more innovative carbon capture technologies.
"Am donating $100M towards a prize for best carbon capture technology," Musk tweeted, adding that he would provide "details next week."
Musk, who briefly passed Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos as the world's richest man before a slide in Tesla's stock price dropped him back a spot, recently asked his Twitter followers for advice on how to best give away his money.
"Critical feedback is always super appreciated, as well as ways to donate money that really make a difference (way harder than it seems)," Musk tweeted earlier this month.
In 2012, Musk signed the Giving Pledge, an initiative launched by Bill Gates and Warren Buffett that asks signatories to donate at least half of their wealth within their lifetimes, and has primarily donated toward science and engineering education, renewable energy research, pediatric research, and human space exploration research.
But an estimate by Forbes in September found that Musk has donated just $100 million so far - less than 1% of his net worth.
Still, Musk's proposed carbon capture contest would go toward a cause that is likely to play a major role in fighting climate change moving forward, espcially under the Biden administration.
Read more: VCs share the 46 climate-tech startups that are set to soar in 2021
A study published Scientific Reports in November concluded that companies and governments urgently need to "start developing the technologies for large-scale removal of greenhouse gases from the atmosphere," a process known as carbon capture and storage (CCS).
Earth's temperatures are already on track to blow past levels that the Paris climate agreement - which President Joe Biden rejoined Wednesday - set as goals for 2100.
But even if all greenhouse-gas emissions stopped by then, according to the study, at least 33 gigatonnes of carbon dioxide would need to be sucked out of the atmosphere each year using carbon capture - roughly the total amount of carbon dioxide the global fossil-fuel industry emitted in 2018 (36 gigatonnes).
The technology is becoming widely accepted as a safe and potentially effective form of geoengineering compared to other approaches, and Biden voiced support for it in his campaign platform, stating that his administration would take steps to "accelerate the development and deployment of carbon capture sequestration technology."
Specifically, Biden wants to make carbon capture more widely available, cheaper, and scalable, and plans to increase federal investments and tax incentives for developing the technology.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/elon-musk-says-100-million-001253218.html
Glad you liked the article but my name is Victor (Civ is Vic backwards) and I have a simple assoc degree from a 2 yr tech college in Waco, TX. I started my initial investment in ow back 2017.
Far from being a securities attorney. Thought the article was relevant to what OW and Ziv are dealing with.
Vic from Texas
SEC Finally going after Toxic Convertible Note Debt Lenders
The OTC Market is plagued with thousands of small public companies taking thousands of small loans in the form of convertible debt. If an issuer takes one of these loans, or several, be prepared in most cases for the company to go sub-penny in 6-12 months. Toxic convertible notes have been the Achilles heel for thousands of OTC Markets issuers. The very nature of the loan is toxic because after 6 months the notes principle and interest can be converted into stock at substantial fixed discounts to trading prices. I have seen discounts as high as 80%, but most average between 30% and 60%.
These “investors” or “lenders” are operating unregulated other than the obligatory SEC filings if they own more than 5%, and more than 10% of a public company, but they strive to avoid the “scrutiny” and have for the most part successfully operated under the SEC’s radar – until now.
While there are dozens of aggressive toxic convertible note investors who offer and provide this type of funding, the walls seem to be closing in on them very quickly now. Within the last 2 months, the SEC commenced two actions against two known toxic lenders seeking 1) disgorgement of all monies made on these stock sales, 2) civil fines, 3) cease and desist order and other relief that the SEC is entitled to under the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act. In the cases of SEC v. JDF Capital, Inc. and John D. Fierro, case no. 3:20-cv-2104 (USDC-New Jersey), and SEC v Justin W. Keener d/b/a JMJ Financial, case no. 20-cv-21254 (USDC SD Fl.), the SEC has accused those defendants with failing to register (oversight) under the ACT while Keener allegedly made $21.5M and Fierro allegedly made $2.3M in profits on purported improper stock sales. The Securities and Exchange Commission, along with the Department of Justice have targeted these toxic lenders simply because they are buying and selling newly issued securities, as a business, without first registering as a “Dealer” as the ACT requires.
Many of these “Investors” or “lenders” are not registered with FINRA, and if they are not registered under the ACT, and required to do so, then all transactions they enter into are – VOID - by federal statute. This allows the SEC to sue those entities, stopping them from buying and selling securities and seeking disgorgement as well as huge civil fines along with cease and desist orders.
But the fun doesn’t stop there – since the 1934 Securities and Exchange Act makes these transactions void (15 US §78cc), OTC Market issuers may now be able to sue every one of their toxic convertible note lenders to rescind all of those transactions if they failed to register as a dealer under the ACT. The federal courts recognize a private right of action for issuers to not only sue to rescind those transactions (meaning the court enters a judgment nullifying the transaction), but under the 1933 Securities Act, those same issuers may have grounds to bring claims for securities fraud under 10b-5 and seek actual money damages, especially from the principles of those funds all because those groups did not register as a dealer with FINRA. Had they registered as a dealer under the ACT, they would be subject to much tighter government scrutiny, oversight and controls that have been developed to protect the investing public and their books could be turned inside out by the regulatory authorities.
I understand that the SEC may now be turning its focus on lenders from New York and Massachusetts. If they do, this will all play out publicly and the real winners are the issuers and their shareholders, at least the ones who have suffered crushing losses because of these types of transactions.
If you are the CEO of a public company and have taken convertible floor-less toxic debt, sold warrants, or entered into an equity line of credit and you want to know more about your rights in connection with this new development, feel free to reach out to me at mark@thebasilelawfirm.com
https://www.thebasilelawfirm.com/post/sec-finally-going-after-toxic-convertible-note-debt-lenders
I haven't said anything out of respect to all the loyal investors on this board. I didn't /don't want to be perceived as someone who is shorting or just bashing. Got into MJLB on 12/22/20 and MJLB's success is my financial success. I'm long on MJLB but if i'd waited one more day I probably wouldn't have bought any shares.
Man, it hurts me to say but you're right. I have done lots of dd and just can't find anything like a 8ks, press releases FROM THE Telus, Iridium Satellite OR Kore Wireless SIDE ANNOUNCING A PARTNERSHIP WITH Ultrack. I scoured the net for any about Tesla or BMW using Ultracks technology...nothing. Please someone calm my nerves and post some legit links showing these partnerships really happened.
Also after lots of research I haven't been able to find who the super Ultrack executive team is other than CEO Michael S. Marsbergen.
The Telus thing doesn't look like a partnership. Looks like MJLB needed help organizing their billing methods and turned to Telus expertise.
------------------------------------------------------------------
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/266926/content
Challenge
After a decade of using their previous telematics
provider, Ultrack quickly started to see a dip in
customer service and technical support due to the
organization closing its main Canadian
headquarters. With their entire operation now in the
United States, Ultrack struggled with on-going
billing errors and random rate increases. They were
also not willing to support the integration
requirements for new customers under their most
recent acquisition.
Ultrack required multiple pricing plans as they have
many different customers that span many markets,
all requiring cost-effective pricing for their
monitoring needs. Ultrack also purchased a
company after its owner passed away. They
needed an IoT provider that knew how to merge
complex operating systems and could tackle
smoothly transitioning customer databases,
accounting systems, dispatch services, human
resources, and maintenance processes seamlessly.
The TELUS Experience
After months of searching and comparing
proposals, Ultrack Systems landed on TELUS as
their new IoT connectivity partner. TELUS
demonstrated strong technical expertise in the eet
market and upheld its reputation as a
customer-centric organization serving small and
large technology companies. The TELUS
Connectivity team worked diligently through the
early stages of the Coronavirus pandemic to make
efcient use of the downtime during the pandemic.
They prepared a phased approach to onboard new
customers while converting their existing
customers seamlessly over to the TELUS network.
TELUS worked closely with Ultrack, focusing on
developing systems and processes that took their
multiple pricing plans and billing requirements,
product roadmap, and hardware and software
integrations into consideration.
Why TELUS?
Partnering with TELUS just four months before the
Coronavirus hit, Ultrack saw a slight dip in the early
months of deployment, which allowed both TELUS
and Ultrack to work on a tiered package plan that
accommodated the needs of all Ultrack customers.
This was a pain point for Ultrack as they not only
had customers that used different connectivity
solutions and data requirements, but they recently
acquired a new company that had specic
contracts and pricing agreements. Also, Ultrack is
launching a new CANBUS monitoring device that
will adhere to the Canadian ELD mandate in early
2021, and TELUS was primed to help with those
deployment efforts.
The Gain
Since the TELUS partnership began, Ultrack has implemented a
non-disruptive, phased deployment approach throughout the pandemic
to its entire customer base, including all of North America and Mexico.
This strategy has been benecial within the last half of the 2020
calendar year as most of their clients are in the transportation and
logistics business and are deemed essential workers.
Ultrack saw a massive uptick in new trailer purchases by its customers,
primarily due to the explosion of e-commerce as a result of the nation's
lockdowns and state-mandated safety guidelines. In addition to food
transport, loads requiring cold chain transport include pharmaceuticals,
personal care products, chemicals, and engineered materials. With
Ultrack's temperature monitoring solutions, many of its customers
required data plans that account for the higher frequency of monitoring
trailers, now available as package plans because of the earlier work
dened by the TELUS and Ultrack partnership.
Future Expansion
With the pricing plans in place and a standardized process
for new customer implementations, Ultrack has been able to
focus on releasing their new hard-wired ELD device
designed according to the Ministry of Transportation
requirements and certied by their 3rd party certication
organization. The device is the rst of its kind and is available
in the rst quarter of 2021.
The device will operate via the TELUS cellular network. It will
conform to all Canadian regulations, including removing any
risk of driver tampering by hard wiring the unit directly behind
the vehicle's dashboard. Files can be downloaded at any
time and sent directly to the Ministry of Transportation,
signicantly streamlining compliance, data security, and
reducing administrative processes by Ultrack's back ofce
team.
10 Best Climate Change Stocks to Buy Now
10. Fuelcell Energy Inc. (NASDAQ:FCEL)
No of HFs: 17
Total Value of HF Holdings: $35 Million
We start the list of best climate change stocks to buy now with Fuelcell Energy, Inc. The company is a fuel cell power company that designs, produces, and operates services Direct Fuel Cell power plants that run on natural gas and biogas. FCEL offers efficient and affordable fuel cell solutions configured for the supply, recovery, and storage of energy. During the third quarter of the year, FCEL posted revenue of $18.7 million.
The top hedge fund holder for this stock is Sander Gerber’s Hudson Bay Capital Management which had over $7 million invested in the stock at the end of September.
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/10-best-climate-change-stocks-183247396.html
FCEL Long. Not selling till C-note.
FCEL Long. Not selling till C-note.
https://autos.yahoo.com/toyota-doubles-down-hydrogen-mirai-175900670.html
The green hydrogen hype
https://www.yahoo.com/news/green-hydrogen-hype-103002979.html
BRUCELAKE and MJMILO thanks to both of yous for talking with Zevi. Hope you guys can talk him out of doing the rs.
Good Luck We're All Counting On You!
Form PRE 14A OWC Pharmaceutical Resea For: Jul 22
BY 10K Wizard
— 4:06 PM ET 07/22/2020
http://archive.fast-edgar.com/20200722/A32YEG2CZC2RSZM3222T2ZY26BTUZZ22Z222
Meanwhile back here in the USA,
https://420intel.com/articles/2020/06/25/ag-barrs-bias-allegedly-spurred-investigations-cannabis-industry
Some believed that the current administration would be friendly to the cannabis industry.
Two interesting articles that I read today.
Sustainable microgrids are the future of clean energy
https://techcrunch.com/2020/03/04/sustainable-microgrids-are-the-future-of-clean-energy/
Germany Moves Into Hydrogen With Lessons From OPEC and Russia
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/germany-moves-hydrogen-lessons-opec-050021172.html
What to do! What to do! I'd like to buy more shares of FCEL but am hesitant because of the proposed RS. After lots of reading I also fear that there won't be enough positive news to get the pps over $1 before the delisting date.
For anyone willing to help a novice investor, when would you make a significant investment in fcel now or after the rs / delisting dust settles . Bout the only thing I'm comfortably sure about is fcels technology.
Really hope some of you are willing to share your thoughts with me.
Thank You in advance.
I'm voting NO to both!
Form 8-K OWC Pharmaceutical Resea For: Oct 22
BY 10K Wizard
— 4:15 PM ET 10/28/2019
http://archive.fast-edgar.com/20191028/AV2ZL22CZC2RB2QX222222X2UTRAZZ22ZVB2
Filed on: October 28, 2019
Form 8-K FUELCELL ENERGY INC For: Oct 21
BY 10K Wizard
— 5:01 PM ET 10/25/2019
http://archive.fast-edgar.com/20191025/ABASGQ2CZW225Z5Z2B2P2ZZ2EQWCZY22Z2B2
Filed on: October 25, 2019
Form PRE 14A FUELCELL ENERGY INC For: Dec 13
BY 10K Wizard
— 5:16 PM ET 10/25/2019
http://archive.fast-edgar.com/20191025/AFA2I22C8Z22VJZU22JC2ZZZPOELH2Y2Z2B2
8k is out
if that happens, investors can use "Appraisal Right"
https://www.investopedia.com/terms/a/appraisalright.asp
Has anyone been able to verify that Brand House Ventures Inc. is a real company? Doing my dd but can't find any info on Brand House Ventures Inc..
New to this board, just discovered SIML last night. Doing the dd. I have a couple of questions for those who know more about this stock and its history.
1) Is the Authorized Shares really 856,529,161 shares?
2) In the SIML intro this statement /post stood out like a red flag!
"all stock ownership and convertible notes went through Donna Murtaugh" Yup, that's CONVICTED FELON SCOTT SANDS' wife
And now they hold FLOORLESS CONvertible preferred shares in this turd.
What's the story behind this? Is this something to worry about and has this issue been cleared up?
Thanks in advance for anyone willing to answer.
https://norml.org/news/2019/07/03/clinical-trial-metered-dosing-of-herbal-cannabis-effective-in-hospitalized-patients
Clinical Trial: Metered Dosing of Herbal Cannabis Effective in Hospitalized Patients
Wednesday, 03 July 2019
Cannabis Metered Dose Inhaler
Haifa, Israel: Hospitalized patients administered cannabis via a metered dose inhaler report symptom relief and no severe adverse effects, according to clinical data published in the journal Palliative & Supportive Care.
Israeli investigators assessed the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of metered dose cannabis inhalation in a group of hospitalized patients. The device allowed for patients to self-administer precise quantities of cannabis in a vaporized (non-combustion) form.
All patients reported reduced pain symptoms following cannabis inhalation. Several subjects also reported relief from nausea and spasticity. No severe adverse effects were reported by any of the study's participants. Three-quarters of the participants reported the inhaler to be "easy to use."
Authors concluded, "[T]he current study results have demonstrated the feasibility of administrating cannabis using the Syqe Inhaler, allowing for the first time, to administer small, safe, accurate, precise, and reliable dosages of cannabinoids" in a hospital setting.
For more information, contact Paul Armentano, NORML Deputy Director. Full text of the study, "Cannabis treatment in hospitalized patients using the SYQE inhaler: Results of a pilot open-label study," appears in Palliative & Supportive Care.