Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Both insider owns 1.7 billion shares. Oh by the way well over $3 million rev in two quarters
10K Management owns 1.7 billion shares they really going to shoot themselves in the leg. Lol
(1) Based upon 1,784,461,982 shares of Common Stock outstanding as of December 31, 2015.
(2) The Series B Convertible Preferred Stock was not convertible into Common Stock on, or within 60 days after, December 31, 2015.
(3) In addition, GBS, in which Mr. Brito holds a 33.33% interest, beneficially owns 450,000 shares of Series B Convertible Preferred Stock, constituting 37.5% of the class
beneficial ownership of Common Stock as of December 31, 2015, for the following: (1) each of o
Security Ownership of Management
Title of class Name of Beneficial Owner Amount and nature of Beneficial Ownership (1) Percent of class
Common Stock Carlos Daniel Silva 800,000,000 44.8 %(1)
Oscar Brito 800,004,000 44.8 %(1)
Alexander Victor Batallés ---- ----
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock Carlos Daniel Silva 600,000 50.0 %(2)
Oscar Brito 150,000 12.5 %(2)(3)
Directors and Executive officers as a group (2 persons) (1) Common Stock 1,600,004,000 89.7.7 %
Series B Convertible Preferred Stock 750,000 (2) 62.5 %(2)
Total assets
December 31, December 31,
2015 2014
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents 58,668 —
Accounts receivable 1,033 —
Inventory 11,223 —
Prepaid and other current assets 174,979 39,010
Total Current Assets 245,903 39,010
Advance payment for real property 369,891 369,991
Investment in non-consolidated subsidiary 159,910 150,000
Property and equipment, net 4,456,832 —
Goodwill — —
2 principals have 1.6 billion...
Silva CEO, Brito CFO and Founder:
$ETELIX USA did $1.3m in Revs 2015 $4m Revs in 2016
So far in 2017
1st Q $705,223
2nd Q $1,957,921
Scheduled to do $8 Million
http://www.nasdaq.com/press-release/metrospaces-announces-execution-of-acquisition-of-51-ownership-in-etelixcom-usa-20170419-00600
51% ownership
These Quarterly earnings can't be ignored for long reversal incoming
http://m.marketwired.com/press-release/metrospaces-announces-2nd-quarter-revenue-of-1957921-for-2017-otc-pink-mspc-2225621.htm
Lv2 shows bitter disgruntled wacker. 1st Q Rev $705,223 2nd Q Rev $1,957,921 51% stake in Etelix putting in work
2016 Qs in few days
"We are working on getting current and should start filing 2016 Qs hopefully in the next few days. This is a top priority for management."
Shake shake remember 1.9 mill rec 2ndQ filling/current anyday
Cj please Stickie 11284, 11287, 11257
HELTER give all your DD to cj
I reached out to humbleboss and he/she DELETTEd the old update. So I got no response back.. I assumed any moment updates coming...BUT I THINK IT WAS A B!TCH MOVE. GETTING THE FEELING WHOEVER DON'T WANNA DO IT... noticed he/she qoutng lots of scriptures on profile thought common courtesy would reply back.
Such is life!
HELTER SKELTER CAN YOU HAVE A MOD PUT UP ALL THE DD NOTES SO THAT THE BOARD CAN REFLECT WHAT'S HAPPENING HERE. ELETIX REVS ARE HUGHE $MSPC REVS ARE OUTSTANDING AND BROOKLYN PROJECT ETC $O MUCH NOT SHOWING ON THIS BOARD. WHY?
CAN SOMEONE PLEASE SO KINDLY UPDATE THE BOARD!Helter selter did a terrific DD update please
stervc, this is Etelix USA...not Etelix Group...it's a part of Etelix Group, MSPC owns 51% of Etelix USA (Etelix.com USA, LLC)...on pace to double revenues from last year...there is also the winery which brings in another half million or so...GLTY
2016 Income Statement:
MSPC Ikal 1150 Lodge & Winery
(the Winery is already, for quite some time, producing)
Link > http://www.ikal1150.com/index.html
(info below may be a little dated and of course is complimentary to Etelix USA)
Can the board MoDs in here update the board please
I am assuming updates incoming.. Thank you
Board mod Please update #msp?
$mspc Etelix MOD $20M revs Metrospaces Announces 2nd Quarter Revenue of $1,957,921 for 2017
http://m.marketwired.com/press-release/metrospaces-announces-2nd-quarter-revenue-of-1957921-for-2017-otc-pink-mspc-2225621.htm
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=12139683
...Etelix’ revenue will grow to $7-8 million in 2017
$mspc Etelix MOD $20M revs Metrospaces Announces 2nd Quarter Revenue of $1,957,921 for 2017
http://m.marketwired.com/press-release/metrospaces-announces-2nd-quarter-revenue-of-1957921-for-2017-otc-pink-mspc-2225621.htm
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=12139683
...Etelix’ revenue will grow to $7-8 million in 2017
$mspc $$Metrospaces Announces 2nd Quarter Revenue of $1,957,921 for 2017
http://m.marketwired.com/press-release/metrospaces-announces-2nd-quarter-revenue-of-1957921-for-2017-otc-pink-mspc-2225621.htm
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=12139683
...Etelix’ revenue will grow to $7-8 million in 2017
Please update. 1.9 mill revs
Please update. 1.9 mill revs
WHATS THE SHARE OS? ANYONE??
OS 89.8B? IS ??THIS CORRECT
You know whats coming.. keep playing mind games.
Buddy the facts are there. Listed in court fillings. I get alerts 7am law360. Say whatever you want. Its in the filling alerts this morning. Why dont you say the same for "Z-Band, Inc and CBV,inc those companies are also on the doc. Why are they listed along with Unifield Online as respondent"
What's the definition of respondent?
Ok, buddy whatever you say. FACTS respondents "Unified Online", "CBV,Inc" and "Z-Band, Inc" along with plaintiff Chanbond all listed on DOCS. Going against 13 companies
LAST MINUTES TO GET IN BEFORE NEWS HITS THE WIRE ON MONDAY. SILLY FOLKS GOT THEIR SHARES STOLEN NEWS IMMINENT.
Alert nEws IMMINENT It's official Unified Online listed in case doc
www.
$uoip case alert pic.twitter.com/ob2Ptw1fEw
— Brav411 (@brav411) June 16, 2017
$uoip officially$$$ pic.twitter.com/F7yFIU6A6N
— Brav411 (@brav411) June 16, 2017
How do I post image? I can post the screen shots
Unifield online listed Anyone misleading saying Unifield Online is not apart of OR in any way have anything to do with Chanbond LLc case. Is flat out short/taken your share
Sign up to law360 have a business email..
Alert sent out today. Most recent.
IMO TAKEOVER/Settlement $$$$$$ ....news IMMINENT!!!
Patents Referenced in Case:
7,941,822 - Intelligent device system and method for distribution of digital signals on a wideband signal distribution system
8,341,679 - Intelligent device system and method for distribution of digital signals on a wideband signal distribution system
8,984,565 - Intelligent device system and method for distribution of digital signals on a wideband signal distribution system
Parties
Defendant
Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC
Represented by:
Michael L. Brody
James C. Lin
Krishnan Padmanabhan
Jonathan E. Retsky
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Steven J. Balick, Ashby & Geddes TERMINATED: 12/08/2015
Defendant
Bright House Networks, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Respondent
CBV, Inc.
Represented by:
Defendant
CSC Holdings, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cable One, Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cablevision Systems Corporation
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cequel Communications, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Plaintiff
ChanBond, LLC
Represented by:
Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard, P.A.
Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A.
Mark S. Raskin
Vanessa Ribeiro Tiradentes, Gould & Ratner LLP TERMINATED: 08/22/2016
Defendant
Charter Communications, Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Comcast Corporation
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cox Communications, Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Mediacom Communications Corporation
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
RCN Telecom Services, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Time Warner Cable Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Respondent
Unified Online, Inc.
Represented by:
Defendant
WaveDivision Holdings, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
WideOpen West Finance, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Respondent
Z-Band, Inc.
Represented by:
updates law360 alert!
Unified Online is on the list :)
IMO settlement reached.. INCOMING news
Patents Referenced in Case:
7,941,822 - Intelligent device system and method for distribution of digital signals on a wideband signal distribution system
8,341,679 - Intelligent device system and method for distribution of digital signals on a wideband signal distribution system
8,984,565 - Intelligent device system and method for distribution of digital signals on a wideband signal distribution system
Parties
Defendant
Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC
Represented by:
Michael L. Brody
James C. Lin
Krishnan Padmanabhan
Jonathan E. Retsky
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Steven J. Balick, Ashby & Geddes TERMINATED: 12/08/2015
Defendant
Bright House Networks, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Respondent
CBV, Inc.
Represented by:
Defendant
CSC Holdings, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cable One, Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cablevision Systems Corporation
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cequel Communications Holdings I, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cequel Communications, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Plaintiff
ChanBond, LLC
Represented by:
Stephen B. Brauerman, Bayard, P.A.
Sara E. Bussiere, Bayard, P.A.
Mark S. Raskin
Vanessa Ribeiro Tiradentes, Gould & Ratner LLP TERMINATED: 08/22/2016
Defendant
Charter Communications, Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Comcast Corporation
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Cox Communications, Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Mediacom Communications Corporation
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
RCN Telecom Services, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Time Warner Cable Enterprises LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
Time Warner Cable Inc.
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Respondent
Unified Online, Inc.
Represented by:
Defendant
WaveDivision Holdings, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Defendant
WideOpen West Finance, LLC
Represented by:
Jennifer Ying, Morris, Nichols, Arsht & Tunnell LLP
Respondent
Z-Band, Inc.
Represented by:
Lol should have checked my email alert from law360. Silly me. Lol
Case Developments
June 12, 2017
ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC
Stipulation-General (See Motion List for Stipulation to Extend Time)
STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order for Extension of Time for Parties to Submit a Joint Status Report and Proposed Revised Schedule until June 15, 2017 by ChanBond, LLC. (Brauerman, Stephen)
What this 3 days extension ?? Is that legit??
Ok, cool. Got it
I thought the status recently updated to denied. Np
So denied meant to Cisco. Go to law360.com and sign up but you would have to use a business email to have access.
I just do not understand "IPR denied"
Law360.com
My Feeds and Alerts
Cases:
Share Delete RSS
Email frequency: Daily | Real-time | Saved Search (No Email Alert)
ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC
Share Delete RSS
Email frequency: Daily | Real-time | Saved Search (No Email Alert)
ChanBond, LLC v. Cable One Inc.
PTAB Cases:
Share Delete RSS
Email frequency: Daily | Real-time | Saved Search (No Email Alert)
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ChanBond, LLC
Share Delete RSS
Email frequency: Daily | Real-time | Saved Search (No Email Alert)
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ChanBond, LLC
Share Delete RSS
Email frequency: Daily | Real-time | Saved Search (No Email Alert)
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ChanBond, LLC
Google search IPR denied
Saw it on law360
"One-fifth of all IPR petitions denied institution according to 2015 PTAB report"
firm Lex Machina released a report on activities at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office’s Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) through the end of 2015. This report helps shed some light on key trends that can give patent owners and lawyers a better idea of what to expect if they find their intellectual property facing a challenge through a PTAB petition.
The Lex Machina PTAB report summarizes trends in petitions filed since the administrative body was formed in September 2012 through petitions terminated as late as December 2015. The 2,700 PTAB petitions analyzed in this report are more than half of the total petitions filed at PTAB; this study doesn’t include data from petitions that haven’t terminated as of yet.
One major takeaway from this PTAB trends report is that, despite claims of high rates of patent invalidation, the reality is that many patents escape the PTAB petitioning process unscathed. To be fair, 18 percent of all PTAB trials lead to an invalidation of every claim challenged in the patent, but one-fifth of all trials are terminated because the petitioning party is denied institution. Thus, the most common result of an inter partes (IPR) or covered business method (CBM) review is that the petitioner is told that they did not make a good enough case for the challenge to progress beyond a hearing before a panel of administrative patent judges"
http://www.ipwatchdog.com/2016/02/09/one-fifth-ipr-petitions-denied-institution-2015-ptab-report/id=65889/
ChanBond, LLC v. Cable One Inc.
Track this case
Case Number:
1:15-cv-00844
Court:
Delaware
Nature of Suit:
Patent
Judge:
Richard G. Andrews
Firms
Ashby & Geddes
Morris Nichols
Companies
Cable One Inc.
Sectors & Industries:
Services
CATV Systems
ChanBond, LLC v. Atlantic Broadband Group, LLC
Case Number:
1:15-cv-00842
Court:
Delaware
Nature of Suit:
Patent
Judge:
Richard G. Andrews
Firms
Ashby & Geddes
Morris Nichols
IPR denied ? Can someone explain????
Case Number:
IPR2016-01900
Case Type:
IPR
Status:
Institution Denied
Petitioner:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Patent Owner:
ChanBond, LLC
Patent Number:
8341679
Tech Center:
2400
Case Number:
IPR2016-01889
Case Type:
IPR
Status:
Institution Denied
Petitioner:
Cisco Systems, Inc.
Patent Owner:
ChanBond, LLC
Patent Number:
8984565
Tech Center:
2400
ALERT*HEMP***CANNBIS*** PGA APPAREL $$$$$$90 MILL FLOAT$$$$$$
Share Structure: 90 Million Float
Authorized: 1,990,000,000.00
Checked with TA at April 20 2017
They increase the authorized to prep
for an S1 registration (possible uplist?)
APRIL 25 2017
Code Green Apparel Explores Development of Hemp-Based Textiles to Broaden Its Sustainable Apparel Product Line
LAGUNA BEACH, CA / ACCESSWIRE / April 25, 2017 / Code Green Apparel Corp. (OTC PINK: CGAC) announces the completion of the initial phases of the exploration of its newest product line, hemp-based textiles. After months of exploration, research and corporate customer dialogue, Code Green will begin development of a hemp-based product line immediately in an effort to broaden the assortment of sustainable fabrics it has to offer customers.
Code Green is strategically positioning itself to build on its already impressive portfolio of sustainable apparel products. The company will incorporate the new Hemp Code line into the portfolio, both horizontally and vertically. Management views the growth of the newest hemp-based lineup is twofold: 1) by tactically developing "product" in house while 2) strategically evaluating business relationships such as partnerships and Joint Ventures with other established companies in targeted, vertical markets.
Code Green has had many discussions with hemp suppliers, companies and experts and will combine each potential partner's respective expertise into a single venture. The current development stage will commence immediately and include fabric, design and product development in order to meet specific requests from customers.
"Code Green is excited about this new hemp-based opportunity, and we believe Hemp Code will provide continued growth into selected markets. The addition of the Hemp Code product line is a natural complement to our existing eco-friendly product lineup," stated George Powell, CEO of Code Green Apparel. "It is not sufficient to offer our customers only recycled products. We strive to create products from many sources of recycled and sustainable textile products. We will move quickly and efficiently, yet responsibly, to make our vision a reality. While we expect the hemp-based product line to provide new customers, the addition Hemp Code will not take any effort or capital away from our existing products nor order fulfillment. We will keep you informed of developments and opportunities as they develop."