Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Nothing exciting in there... Just kind of details how they got screwed by hudson bay
Judge Casper seems to be pretty busy today and tomorrow. I don't think anything will happen until the after holidays.
I think you mean 90 days if it was 45 days we would have 8 quarters per year lol.
I thought the filing was for monday? If not I don't know why they didn't file a NT
Why do people always assume market activity is money makers? Someone has consistently been shorting this stock but its only a matter of about 8 grand per day. Not what I would define as a MM
I don't think that chart looks ugly for current investors... maybe for people who invested back in June.
Currently the stock is in an uptrend and will likely continue until news is out
That 200 shares can be worth 2000$ one day according to Markmanrunup lol
Looks like today will have a high short volume percentage, that's the only thing keeping this from slowly creeping up imo
There is nothing to get... It is simply a pump and dump stock and they will try to release PR's to get people on board. This company changes it's business model biannually lol. It has been about a year and they can't even get the majestic menu website up and running, what are they using the same programmers as obamacare?
Mining is not something I would want get into at this time anyway, especially at the risk of dilution.
High volume of 800K on friday and only 10% short volume. Looking good for the PPS of the near future.
Also, good price action today. People are anticipating something coming soon from the judge.
Which document? Almost all of the documents in this case are released in the 1-3PM time frame.
I agree that the verdict will be out soon, sometime before the thanksgiving holiday. Seems like others are anticipating this as well with the price action today.
Yeah, because the Judge will working on a national holiday.
No,I think it is because everyone realized how great WDDD was and they are holding lol
I believe there would be no difference in lawyer fees for Worlds since S&G are getting paid contingent upon the settlement. I was talking about lawyer fees for future companies worlds sues being more likely to settle and not pay lawyer fees.
Also if they move quickly with a settlement, they can pursue other companies quicker.
It boils down to risk mitigation.
I think it will be likely worlds will settle after the MSJ is denied for 1-2% royalties. Then all they will have to do is open up cases against other infringers and they will also settle to avoid having to pay expensive law fees.
This has such a high potential it is ridiculous not to want to get in at these low prices.
You must know your assumptions are ridiculous, right?
8% royalty rate? You can't quantify the risk in this stock.
Your monte carlo analysis is nice but as I described before the calculation is simply based on sketching a box on a piece of paper and then randomly putting dots on the paper. From this you can calculate the area of the box via statistics. The problem here is you don't know the boundary of the box!
Thanks for your efforts but there are too many unknowns in this case.
The things I'm basing my investment off of are
-The CEO is a huge shareholder with a low salary
-Worlds has won in court before
-little dilution for the type of stock
-huge upside from current prices
Yeah that's the good thing about the stock is how thin it is on top. It will burst with good news that is why I keep buying.
Lol I was toying with your emotions... Just a transcript notice along with a redact notice (which does not make sense since the video is posted online!).
I do expect news to be out soon. Document 107 from worlds is pretty clear cut pointing the judge to all the information she needs.
New Pacer doc out!!!! MSJ denied
If the Judge reads the transcript,imo
Ropes and Gray is retaining the same lawyers in this case.
Jesse J. Jenner
Gene W. Lee
David S. Chun
Brian P. Biddinger
Are all representing activision as they did NCsoft.
Interesting...
I guess the good thing to keep in mind is world has won in court (see case 3:09-cv-01982-MHP) for an undisclosed amount. This was before a few other patents were granted! Worlds may still be seeing royalties from a licensing agreement for all we know.
What is interesting to note is the same people defending activision are the same people that defended NCsoft. It was a big issue to find evidence of a "prior art" and they even offered 50K to someone who could find evidence. Obviously, that never happened. Ropes and gray turned to worlds not properly linking the provisional application this time around.
I wouldn't be surprised to see a settlement occur after the MSJ is denied. And then it's on to the next one.
I keep gaining more and more confidence in this stock.
I'm more of a risk mitigation guy. I flip a lot of gold stocks (my favorite) and others based on a program I wrote. It is pretty amazing how when gold jumps/drops greater than 2% within two weeks it almost always is instantly corrected. ETF holdings are also at 2009 levels meaning if the market turns bullish gold will shoot up.
I do appreciate your way of thinking, all in or nothing but I would rather make money along the way. I may miss the big jump that you will enjoy!
Good luck
You have 120,000$ or more to invest in a gamble or do you have an extra zero in there?
I have $20k in here and that is all I would risk losing and I am a risk taker. I trade about 25-50K every week when I can get rid of them at .17-.18 and then buy back in the .15's to make up from my loses when I bought in the mid 20's.
50% short volume yesterday
Short volume has lightened up so that is good.
That is the only thing I could find... it is only down 3.5% so nothing big. Also no updates on pacer
VIVENDI a 10% owner sold shares back to the CEO
Private financing... We have no idea of the terms, we just know that it is non-dilution meaning no shares were issued.
There is probably an interest rate tacked on, probably at the wall street journal rate.
We're talking about SG representing worlds in the ATVI lawsuit against them
This is great news, I wonder the amount that was financed? Specifically, how much Kidrin put in.
And to think I was tempted to sell in the .16's yesterday!
Well when the CEO has a twitter and states this:
"Daniel Solomita ?@dannysolomita 25 Jun
@jimcramer please help. Small plastic recycling company needing to get proposal to Dupont CEO to help planet and make money... plesse help"
I don't think this one is going anywhere lol.
good buying action in the upper .15's
Yes. It is only logic.
Worlds asked the court to correct the errors and ATVI is saying it is not within a courts authority to overrule the laws set in place at the time.
So a simple solution would be to meet both parties in the middle and access damages from the certificate of correction date.
Using this logic (although courts do not function with logic!) assuming 50 percent chance for the court to rule in the middle and 25% for the other cases, there is only a 25% chance the MSJ will be denied.
That is my view on the statistics of the case and yes statistics is not really math and doesn't make sense to me lol
Louis,
You are missing the ATVI's point that worlds first patent was awarded in april 2000 (prior to section 1.78 effective date on nov 29th, 2000).
This means that worlds did not have the specific reference that was required.
You're argument is valid (I agree fully that this is how it should work). Especially since worlds has documented proof that the USPTO was erroneous and corrections they tried to make along the way. The USPTO even recommends that the court should use the section 1.78 for cases before the effective date.
At the end of the day it is worlds fault that they did not take the means necessary in applying the nonprovisional patent in the 045 and 690 patents.
While I understand your theory it is not accurate.
Worlds did not include the specific reference to the provisional application that was required at the time (section 1.78). Although it was included in data sheets (not application data sheets!) and other transmittal it still did not follow rules at the time (interpreting it from the judges standpoint).
This is a very unique case and it would not create chaos. I do believe that the court will meet in the middle and state that infringement will occur after the 8-14-2013 certificate of correction.
The only reason I am still in is because ATVI put on a guy that is there to argue technical issues of the patent claims. They are obviously expecting a strong possibility of the msj being denied (partially or MAYBE completely) and a markman scheduled relatively quickly. Or they would have just waited to hear the outcome before investing resources to the case.
I have a smaller position now hoping for a bounce or a strong drop to purchase more.
Here is the case Worlds constantly refers to https://www.casetext.com/case/ei-du-pont-de-nemours-v-macdermid-printing/
This was filed after the November 29, 2000 effective date to section 1.78, so the Judge may see this as irrelevant (she already noted the effective date during the MSJ). The certificate of correction was also in place at the time of the settlement.
Worlds points out MPEP $ 1481.03 that states, "for applications filled before November 29, 2000 it ís the version of 37 C.F.R. S 1.78, which was in effect as of November 29, 2000, that applies." The court is not bound by this and can rule as it pleases.
I don't believe the judge will rule in favor of worlds because she already has dismissed MPEP regarding the effective date of section 1.78.
I believe the best case is worlds will be able to sue for damages after the certificate of correction (8-14-2013) and the worst case is this is just dismissed.
Lol monte carlo analysis. Monte carlo analysis can be summed up by drawing a box on a piece of paper and placing dots all around the paper and counting how many landed within the box.
Anyway, you never factored in the risk of a loss in the trial but you did factor in 40 million of NOL which isn't liabilities. The company only has 5mil in liabilities from what I see.
Thanks for your help though.
Well I have decided to buy at .15.
This went down way to fast and will rise back up by the end of the day imo.
Why is the court taking so long to upload the video? It is supposed to be uploaded with a FEW hours!