Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Gainmaker, would you please point me to a NI43-101 report or other written documentation that identifies the AGCZ proven gold reserves you referred to? Was it in a separate document, included in a PR, attached to a financial report, or other?
Doc_K, BINGO, I think you hit it square on the head. Good job!
Zipcash, you referred to an incorrect website in your post this morning. For future reference, the website you gave out is for AI Systems International Corporation, which is NOT the same as AISystems, Inc. (ASYI). The names look to be very similar, but they differ with a space between AI and Systems, and International Corporation versus Incorporated. Easy to mix up if you weren't aware. The correct website to reference for ASYI is http://www.aisystems.org , however, you'll find it is "unavailable" since the company stopped its activities back in 2012.
trum, the Daily Dump Report (DDP) was at least a factual representation of the actual PYCT trades made, granted, as you point out previously, it may mislead some into thinking that exceeding the 30 second window creates an on-going short for years on end, which is untrue. Now, I can't help but shake my head at all the time and effort going into it, especially with the new unprovable speculation being dumped into the mix. How disappointing to see.
This new attempt to blend into the data some subjective mix and match numbers to somehow try and explain how the evil MMs/shorts are spending their time and money just to try and make PYCT shareholders think that other shareholders are selling their shares BELOW $0.0001 is comical (and I'm being polite).
And, what about the created mix and matches within the same trading day (so the supposed short would then show), or those mysterious matches made 23 hours later, or 7 days later, or even the grueling 15 day matched set. Man, someone must have been sweating bullets for those two weeks for that 4,000 ($0.40) share trade matchup. I'm sure that one really convinced shareholders that others were selling their shares. LOL What a use of time, that still results in nothing but more unproven speculation. I guess there is no effort too large to try and prove a false hypothesis.
Concern for potential money laundering, or afraid FED might step in and seize and/or freeze PHOT liquid assets? What did the banks sniff out before the SEC suspension announcement on April 10th, and did whatever they see lead or contribute to it? This whole story is getting more interesting by the week.
Good luck to the longs.
Loyalhound, thanks for posting your thoughts on this. You could be right about the conjecture. However, if that was the case, I'd think Talbot would be smart enough to list it as "services" from a consultant or some such. By him listing it as some debt repayment the big red flag goes up, especially when the terms aren't disclosed to the investors. Imagine if "Roy Meadows" is still owed say $8M, at a 10% interest rate, and that he can get it converted into AGCZ common shares at 25% under current market value. That kind of deal may all but destroy any potential for this stock. IMO it's a bad sign when the CEO openly talks about shorts when such dilution from insiders is so painfully evident.
I must say that on the surface this looks like a good company, with the touted revenues and profits, but peeling the skin back the transparency just isn't there. As such, I did end up submitting a fraud concern on the SEC website, so let's see if they decide to do anything to help persuade Talbot to better disclose just what all is going on with the company financials.
Anyway, good day to you.
This acquisition PR is some kind of joke as it has no chance of being independently verified by anyone. They acquired SOME company SOMEWHERE in the U.S., and they don't even know when it was founded (SOMETIME in the 2000s).
LODE is being systematically destroyed from within as the mismanagement continues.
Rusirius, I'm now inclined to agree with your statement ...
ASYI = Revoked shell, SEC suspension imminent, no business, no employees, no phones or address, 5B A/S, $8M in debt, you get the picture ... buyer beware
PYCT = 27.8B shs, NO products, $0 Revs, $0 cash, toxic financing, board member bailed, NO-BID for 99.9% of time over last many years, CTO in BC Canada, YIELD sign at OTC Markets, massive share dilution, 2 DTC Chills, fluff non-verifiable PRs, you get the picture ... buyer beware
TM, that was a good post and sums up the PHOT situation nicely imo. I think the brick and mortars will continue to increase in revenue generation and may even someday become profitable. The chance for any deals or merger I believe has been greatly diminished due to the suspension and impending litigation. What this all means to the share price in the medium to long term is anyone's guess.
Good day to you.
Here I thought the AGCZ share dilution was bad in 2013. Has everyone now taken a look at the 1st quarter report, just posted yesterday (May 12, 2014)? There are now over 4 BILLION shares issued (yep, up OVER 1 BILLION shares from just a couple months ago), and they bumped up the A/S by a billion to now be at 4.5 billion. And, Roy Meadows is at the trough again, with another new 100,000,000 shares issued to him in January.
This is getting ridiculous, no wonder the share price is doing nothing but going down. Definitely looks like Rob and the insiders are taking advantage with pumped up financials and touting to enable dumping as much and as fast as the market can bear. And Rob has the nerve to distract and point people in the other direction by blaming this share price malaise on shorters? Yeah, right!
Just how pumped up the financials may be and just how many undisclosed financial transactions (loans) there are beyond Roy's deal, and what the terms are, is anyone's guess. I know folks like to talk about all the good revenue and profit numbers, but what if all that is based on incomplete information or outright fraud. Something's not right here imo. And, where is the SEC in all this? Looks like it might be time to get the SEC involved and see if they'll look into this and maybe do something to help the investment community better understand what's going on behind the AGCZ curtain.
2013 Financial Report and Disclosure: AGCZ almost doubled its outstanding shares in 2013, by issuing 929 Million shares for debt conversion and another 480 Million shares for services, taking the total outstanding shares from 1,583,031,318 to 2,992,031,318 shares.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=AGCZ&id=117660
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=AGCZ&id=117661
1st Qtr 2014 Interim Financial Report and Disclosure: AGCZ outstanding is now at 4,092,031,318 shares and the A/S was just increased to 4,500,000,000 shares.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=AGCZ&id=120307
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=AGCZ&id=120308
Anyway, good luck to the shareholders. Looks like you're going to need it.
What happened with Vivian Phillips (one of PayChest's Board of Directors)? The 2012 annual report indicated Vivian owned preferred shares that were convertible to common shares, and the 2013 report shows that Vivian is no longer in the company (bio was removed) and that the preferred shares no longer exist (removed from share summary table). This is very strange to see happening during the DTC Chill, and I would have expected to see some news from the company on this. I'd also expect there should be a filing of some kind disclosing the leaving and the insider share conversions (more i's and t's I suppose).
GT-Trader, if you mean ASYI might be moving soon to the Grey Sheets, then I'm inclined to agree with you. I believe the SEC has the green light to suspend the stock starting next Wednesday (5/21), being the two year anniversary since they last disclosed financial info to the investing public. At that time, the game of "musical shares" should end and the new game of "hot potato" should begin as the grey sheet stock graveyard takes hold.
Gainmaker, I already gave you a response in one of my earlier posts. You might not like or agree with its contents, but I refuse to buy any of this stock until the Roy Meadows situation is answered. It is very serious as he has been issued and sold hundreds of millions of shares over this last year. As a by product of this, along with shares issued for other debt and services, AGCZ has almost doubled their outstanding shares in a year which dilutes the shareholders and adds pressure to keep the stock price suppressed. Don't know what more explaining is needed here.
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101258888
http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=101003579
Anyway, have a good one.
PTG, first, I guess I'm at a loss about Transfer Online being mentioned as associated with CMKX. Here is a link that indicated 1st Global Stock Transfer LLC was their TA, not Transfer Online. The 9th Circuit Court ruled that the 1st Global (and Helen Bagely) wasn't responsible in the CMKX fraud issues.
http://ragingbull.com/forum/topic/966831
Secondly, my understanding is that Transfer Online is a sound company that has good internal compliance audit processes. I've not heard anything derogatory about them during my investing career. Granted, the only stock I've been in using their services was about 12 years ago with a company called MPTV, who died a slow death due to natural causes (e.g., didn't run a good business model and ran out of money).
I have not reviewed Transfer Online's client list looking for any abnormalities, and really don't wish to spend any of my time doing so. I will say this though, that I credit them with bringing to light the PYCT preferred share conversion issue and working to help resolve problems with the DTC to get the Chill finally lifted. So, as far as I'm concerned, they're doing their job and helping keep PayChest on its toes, dotting the i's and crossing the t's.
As a side note, I can't imagine how this would have played out if PayChest was still acting as their own TA. My guess would be that the share conversions would have gone through, the O/S would have exceeded the A/S, the SEC would have then stepped in and suspended the stock, and PayChest would now be trading on the Grey Sheets. Of course, that's only a guess, but a pretty educated one. lol
Anyway, have a good one.
the_cork, I wholeheartedly agree, great breadth and caliber. Hecla has a lot to offer and brings much promise for the future. Silver and other precious metals are a mainstay to drive both old and new economies. I definitely look forward to the day when the sentiment swings and again starts favoring the mining sector.
As long as Hecla continues to increase its resource base and production levels shareholders should be golden, especially a couple of years down the road when I foresee hyperinflation taking hold and the metals prices heading skyward. Only then will I expect average citizens to take notice and start to get involved in a significant way. I then see the late 70's and early 80's being reenacted.
Anyway, good day to you and all.
winstoncooper, what does that referenced no name website have to do with SRGE or MJS, since both companies haven't been heard from for well over a year? That site has indicated the same promise of providing updated information since it was first hatched.
I would certainly think myself the fool if I believed that a touted multi-hundred million dollar company such as SRGE should behave this way and not give a single avenue for investors to contact them. Makes absolutely zero sense, unless they closed up shop in the middle of the night and headed for the hills. The SEC suspended SRGE for a reason, and the fact that management disappeared shortly thereafter speaks volumes as to their guilt imo.
Maybe that website won't be waste of space after all as it could possibly be used to post the SRGE criminal indictments when they start to roll in. Still hoping that ill gotten gains will be successfully disgorged and the shareholders can at least get some of their money back.
Anyway, good luck to you. GO SRGE !!
smoke_snot, I agree, manuals are essentially livings documents, especially those that may have Illustrate Parts Breakdowns (IPB) and component part numbers referenced within them. Those documents that contain part numbers are subject to change as alternate component suppliers are used and improved products/upgrades occur. There is also the very real situation that most manuals can always be improved upon (both in format and content detail). Show me a mature manual and I bet you'll see it's undergone multiple major revision cycles. That being said, it still would be nice for Baltia to establish a baseline set of documents that can get the blessing to start operations. Certainly looking forward to putting that milestone to bed.
Anyway, good day to you.
Not a bad financial report for 1st qtr 2014. CROCF produced a mountain of gold, but to capitalize on it they need to go much further in reducing their costs (direct and indirect). Even though they greatly improved their All In sustaining Cash Costs per ounce sold ($) over the 2013 number, the current $1,307 is still way too high. Even if the POG improves in the next two quarters it doesn't look like they will make profitability. Heaven forbid if gold turns south from here and over any prolonged period of time.
Would be nice if the Plunge Protection Team were on the side of the metals and miners for once. Maybe in my life time, one could only hope. lol
http://ih.advfn.com/p.php?pid=nmona&article=62172311&symbol=CROCF
Anyway, good day to all.
Companies such as PayChest, with prolonged poor stock performance, almost always try to blame it on actions of the evil MMs, when in fact the cause is directly due to the company itself. In most 000 stock cases, it's typically either due to extreme share dilution or inadequate/improper business execution. In PayChest's case, it's due to both of those reasons.
Share Structure and Dilution: The company has issued over 20 BILLION shares into the O/S in the last 10 years, and much of it was under the cover of toxic financing arrangements (loans), whereby the insiders/funders converted their preferred shares and/or notes at a discount to the market share price of PYCT. This allows them to sell shares at UNDER $0.0001 and still make bank. Of course, PayChest has in the past issued billions of common shares to pay for provided services. All in all, today PayChest reports they have a 27.8 BILLION share O/S. And as recently disclosed, in line with the cause of the DTC Chill, additional share transactions are looming to increase this number closer to the approved new 29 BILLION A/S. So, get ready for more dilution to hit as the upcoming PR's are paraded forward.
Inadequate/Improper Business Execution: PayChest also has shown to be a complete failure at developing and selling any real product, even after spending tens of millions of dollars and many years of trying. The company continues to identify it has NO full time employees, and the part timers they have are obviously incapable of performing the necessary activities to create a viable and revenue generating business. Also, not only has PayChest clearly demonstrated they can't abide by various rules and regulations imposed on them for being a publicly held company (e.g., caused the CTO in BC Canada, two DTC Chills, and "YIELD" and "STOP" signs in the OTC Market), but they continually prove they even have a difficult time in simply dotting i's and crossing t's.
Even more importantly, the company seems to go out of its way to be viewed as illegitimate by not disclosing (hiding) various significant details that should be able to be independently verified by investors. Some examples of this would include Xinpro, which has yet to be confirmed as existing, as well as the supposed distributor David Shaw. The company even refuses to identify in writing the responsible organization/entity for producing the pad and liner end products, and its packaging (note: only Xinpro has been identified for producing the "film" portion of the products). So, why does PayChest continue to hide these details from the investing public? Could it be because they truly don't have the goods? I don't think the PYCT share price would be sitting at $0.0001 for years on end if the investment community thought otherwise.
Nope, unfortunately the only thing PayChest is currently renown for is diluting shareholders into oblivion. And that is something I wouldn't be to proud of if I were in their shoes.
Just another day in the land of PayChest.
Sure sounds suspicious with Alan Hammer exiting the door so quickly. The SEC obviously found/saw something going on at PHOT. Wonder just how deep this goes, and whether anything is being forwarded to the Justice Department from criminal prosecutions?
http://www.otcmarkets.com/edgar/GetFilingHtml?FilingID=9981890
Remember, that which does not kill us only makes us stronger.
Anyway, good luck longs. GO PHOT !!
The pattern I see is ...
the attempted pattern at creating a pattern.
Yep, matches reported for after market hours, or 23 hours later, or 7 days later, or even a whopping 15 days later, etc.. Using this approach I suppose if a 100 day trading window was used then every single UNDER $0.0001 trade could be mixed and matched with a $0.0001 counterpart. LOL
Although entertaining, pursuing a mythical PYCT short is just a distraction from the REAL issues with PayChest, and their utter lack of ability to execute and create a viable, revenue producing business. But, in their defense, they sure do know how to entice buying of their ever present massive amounts of $0.0001 paper that's for sale. Last I saw, PayChest was upping its game with the recent A/S increase to 29 BILLION shares, readying themselves to sell more shares than McDonald's has sold hamburgers. Now that would be a great feat indeed. One that I'm confident they're ready and able to succeed in.
Anyway, good day to all.
FREEDOM4, concerning PYCT share structure, the short answer is ...
Authorized Share limit is 29,000,000,000 shares.
See Page 4 of the 2013 annual report (link is below).
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=PYCT&id=120132
Outstanding Shares is 27,850,264,936 shares.
But, it should be mentioned that this O/S number is about to change due to two things (see quote, taken from Page 5 of the 2013 annual report). First, the company just announced their intent to complete the 100M share buyback that was started and then held up when the DTC Chill occurred. Secondly, they also indicated that other in-work transactions from the insider/funders would be revisited as well. Obviously, they were unable to convert their preferred shares and Notes due to the DTC Chill, so those should soon be completed with PayChest then issuing more common shares into the outstanding. Unfortunately, no one really knows just how much of the 1.2 Billion shares available these other transactions may represent. Also, as the insiders/funders, even after previous converting billions of shares, continue to not be listed in the Beneficial Shareholders list, many expect these new shares to likely hit the market soon.
stevecameron73, you're quite right, no company will consider merging with PHOT with an undefined litigation liability hanging over their heads. As such, I wouldn't expect any such deals until this mess is resolved, or at least is better understood and quantified as to potential fines and settlement payout amounts. If any of the allegations move to the Justice Department then all bets are off.
Nope, instead PHOT will have to do their best and create/maintain sales in their brick and mortar stores as this all moves through the course.
Good luck to the shareholders.
When SRGE got suspended by the SEC for making false and misleading statements, many shareholders were utterly shocked and amazed. The ensuing devastation of share price on the Grey's, and subsequent disappearance of SRGE management, has left many to wonder if their lost monies will ever be recovered. Hopefully, once the SRGE miscreants that caused all this hardship are brought to justice, and their ill gotten gains are disgorged, there will be some money left over to give back to the down-trodden shareholders. That would be nice end to this otherwise unhappy story.
BTW, I was able to locate a picture of one of the SRGE shareholders, just as the SEC suspension news hit the wire.
"A Big Money Trader reaction during the SRGE suspension announcement"
goarmy123, find that NOBO list yet? LOL
Surely after 8 longs months you didn't think folks would forget about the promise. HOOAH!!!
oxnous, you're right, the chart may be trying to tell us the FSLR share price wants to revisit the next large support level at around $58. If it dare does that then I'm a buyer by no choice, as I'd consider that to be a major bargain. Wonder if the old saying "Sell in May and go away" will take hold this year?
Anyway, good day to you.
123tom, I'd have to say a three year HL chart is a scary enough price retracement for my taste and I'm not aware of how to apply an elliot wave to a 10 year period and project a possible future price.
Actually, I'm looking at the one year chart and from that it looks like a large flag forming. It's narrow enough that I'd conclude a large base is building at the current trading levels. Whether the HL share price breaks down from here is anyone's guess, but I'm thinking it will start its ascent in the summer.
Have a good one.
Rusirius, it looks like they may have used a pre-feasibility study model knowing that they intended later to get higher definition and resource numbers. To do this right, they need enough high fidelity data on all those attributes you mentioned to do a Bankable Feasibility Study. Only then would the confidence levels be great enough to obtain and expend significantly more funds.
Will have to see where this all goes over the next two quarters. One positive note is that Jim Sinclair believes that the POG should be increasing at a good clip later this summer, which can only help to improve LODE and the other struggling miners situations going forward.
Anyway, have a good one.
Other than Baltia continuing its progress on getting certified and the aircraft ready for first flight, the trading over the last few days indicates that a new base may be building, with support close to the 1 cent level. This next week will be key to verify if this is the case. Might be a decent level to launch from if good news comes by month's end. Guess we'll have to wait and see, as patience is the key.
Good day to all.
space1230, just think, someone sacrificed not buying a McDonald's happy meal to make this ASYI trade today. All kidding aside, I think those kind of miniscule trades are done just to prop up the ASYI chart to show something other than a zero trade day. Other than seeing a falling share price, nothing probably burns shareholders more than to see that no one is interested in buying what some may hold so dearly. I understand that wouldn't be the case for the lottery ticket holders.
If it's not chart propping, then maybe the mysterious "entity" has finally blown his wad and spent his last couple of bucks. If this is the case, then it is truly a sad day for ASYI. :(
Whatever the reason for today's "stellar" volume, it's just another day closer to the impending SEC suspension of this abandoned, debt-ridden, recently revoked shell of a company called ASYI.
Have a good one.
PayChest NOT Owner of Mibella Trademark
Now why would PayChest continue to imply that they have rights to the Mibella trademark when Cardiff Bay Holdings are the new registered owners, the same company that holds the Flushaway tech license agreement and has the notorious John Banks as a principle? PayChest sure didn't disclosed how they supposedly obtained such rights to the Mibella trademark in their just released annual report. In fact, PayChest is only now beginning to negotiate with Cardiff for renewal of the Flushaway tech license agreement, as depicted in one of my recent posts.
The PayChest statement:
lakers17, what, you don't believe that? LOL
Don't you know that ZERO revenue, zero cash, and zero product companies are moved to the head of the line to get such a prestigious listing? Actually, all one has to do is research what the listing requirements are for NASDAQ and they'd see that is a pipe dream for PayChest.
Beyond the dream of uplisting, it's still good the company insists they will not do a R/S. Now if they could do the same and state they will NOT raise the A/S limit, then the shareholders would have something to crow about.
Have a good one.
PRmaniac, the PYCT A/S is now 29,000,000,000 shares (see Page 4 of the annual report). PayChest implemented this 1 Billion share increase as approved in last year's shareholder meeting. The O/S didn't show an increase as the DTC Chill restricted the insiders/funders ability to convert their preferred shares and Notes (e.g., the TA couldn't electronically process changes while the Chill was in effect).
With this new A/S, PayChest now has room to issue another 1,200,000,000 shares into the outstanding. The question is has this process already started and been part of the reason for the recurring No-Bid, even after release of good news. Next quarter's financial report should give investors this insight.
BTW, PayChest continues to assert they will not do a R/S unless it's to help move to a higher trading exchange. As such, they are obviously going the other route, to increase the A/S limit as may be required, to obtain additional funding. I understand their need for funding, I just criticize and question how they spend it on trying to sell $0.0001 paper (through shareholder letter and paid stock promos) at the sacrifice to better moving the actual business forward.
http://www.otcmarkets.com/financialReportViewer?symbol=PYCT&id=120132
Anyway, good day to you.
Tech License has NOT been renewed
gtweb, why did you only cut and paste a limited portion of the paragraph from Page 6? What you ended up posting omitted some context information which by doing so could very well mislead folks into incorrectly thinking that the expired July 2012 Technology License Agreement had already been renewed. This is not the case as explained below.
As read, Page 6 addresses past history aspects, and talked of the initial license extension that lasted from 2008 to July 2012. It doesn't address today's latest situation as shown on Page 8. Page 8 presents the latest info and clearly states that the expired license renewal is only now starting to be being negotiated since the lifting of the Chill.
Page 6: Here is the entire paragraph so that folks can see for themselves the context. The underlined portion reflect what your post contained.
Unfortunately, there is a world of difference comparing SRGE trading in 2012, and now.
In 2012, SRGE was issuing false and misleading information according to the SEC, and because of it folks were standing in line to buy into all the hype that was being spewed (e.g., great mining progress, cash dividends, JV being signed, etc.). Then, the SEC finally stepped in and suspended SRGE in late Dec. 2012. The great stock manipulation then ceased as SRGE was thrown to the Grey Sheets.
Since being suspended, SRGE management has disappeared and there is no way to contact them. No phones, e-mail or business address to be found. And since that event, the SRGE share price has crumbled from $0.005 down to $0.0005, while average daily trading volumes have dropped nearly the same percentage amount.
So, today, now that folks are painfully aware of SRGE's shaddy past and the SEC suspension, and managements complete absence from the scene, why should anyone but a fool think that there will be something good coming down the pipe other than eventual indictments of the SRGE miscreants? Based on this, and the fact SRGE now sits on the grey sheets, I give any possibility for a run to the pre-suspension share price level akin to the odds of winning a state lottery. And, evidently I'm not alone in coming to this conclusion as has been shown with the anemic SRGE trading volumes these past many months. If folks actually thought there's an impending run and that they could get their money back, we'd be seeing 10's of millions of shares being bought daily, not the couple hundred bucks worth we occasionally witness.
Getting past the first stage of the five stages of denial is probably the hardest. Good day to all.
EarnestDD, another truly sad part in this saga is that anyone who listened to the SRGE IRP and turned in their shares in exchange for a certificate will eventually find out that NO brokerage will accept a SRGE share certificate for redemption. I don't know how many shareholders decided to follow his bad advice (based on the SRGE IRP's following I'd have to assume there were quite a few, but no where near the 80% he was touting at the time), but it's my understanding that NOT one brokerage will accept a SRGE certificate for deposit. For anyone that doesn't believe this, go ahead and give your brokerage a quick call to verify.
So, even if a certificated shareholder decides to finally sell their SRGE shares they will be stuck with no method to do so. Talk about being royally screwed. Because of this situation I'm not even sure how a person could write-off their investment as a total loss, since they will never be able to unload the certificate and sell the shares.
Boy did the insiders do a number on the SRGE shareholders. My condolences and better luck next time.
Good day to all.
Alilstockman, I agree "that's not a fluke".
What it is, is a couple hundred story believers and/or flippers getting sucked in to the continuing game of ASYI "musical shares".
There are currently indicated to be 400 followers just on this I-HUB message board for ASYI. If 250 of them on average spent $400 each, that would yield $100K. Obviously some spent more and some less on this lottery ticket.
Of course, let's not lose sight of the fact that over the last two years, ASYI shares were likely cycled a couple of times as this share shuffle game continues unabated. Almost everyone who sold their shares over this period of time has either broke even or lost money, depending on their entry point, as very few trades have occurred at $0.0002 or higher.
Anyway, glad I could clear that up for you. Have a good one.
P.S. oops, forgot to say that ASYI is an abandoned, recently revoked, debt-ridden shell of a company, soon to be suspended by the SEC for lack of material information being provided to the public over the last two years.
Looking at the 5 year chart for TRX, I see a super flag (falling wedge) that likely will arrive at a decision point towards the end of this year. Breaking out of this technical pattern should be explosive to the upside or downside. Since I see good things on the horizon fundamentally for TRX, namely production and royalty income, and expect POG and silver prices to regain upward momentum by year's end, I think any massive breakout will be to the upside. A $5 price tag for shares might be a reasonable expectation over the medium term.
Anyway, good day to all.