Tomatoe Tomato Can you provide a link to that 170,000,000 share claim? Can you provide a link to the refusal to file audited fins? They can file to delay the reporting which is not a refusal and legal. Again these are the OTC's and opinions are what they are.

You got any links to those claims of no dilution? I have been lookin around for some other than statements made by posters on this board. If you have some can you post them?

Appears the dilution was designed to get product to market. All sorts of claims from all sorts of folks about all sorts of things. Hard to keep it all straight. Time will tell. Tomaaaaato tomato.

Which takes me back to our original topic, the chart. I can't account for what they say. What is the share structure, what does the chart tell me?

In business and in politics some time the means justify the end and vice a versa. They do have a product and if they can make it to the point where financing is an option in advancing the business, I would venture all investors will be pleased.

That is your opinion. Perhaps financing at the necessary levels required to manufacture, market, and sell the product was not available. This may have been the only way to achieve market sales and distribution. Anyone that can read filings could see that.
Now the choice is do you believe they are trying to get a product to market or not. If I am MRIB, just trying to sale shares as you claim, I can think of many other ways to accomplish that which are not going to require me to create any amount of a good and cut into my profit from dumping shares.
Not saying this isn't risky, but damn they sure are putting product on the market (infancy) and that costs money. This aint APPLE

Unless you can produce some sort of information that is not available then all anybody can go by is the chart and the reported share structure. The chart does not take into account any individuals version of what they think the share structure is. Resistance is resistance support is support. Period!

Chart Resistance if you know how to read them you will see that just above .01 was an area of support. Now that it has climbed back to that area of .01 it then becomes resistance. Nothing illegal about chart resistance.

Letter of credit
http://biztaxlaw.about.com/od/glossaryl/g/letterofcredit.htm

Hello all. Have enjoyed reading the posts on this board for about a week and a half now. Also am happy with my position as most seem to be. If I might give a cent of opinion about the youtube release, I believe we wont be able to access it until after the market closes. This will allow the board to listen in and "spread the word" about the merger and future developments. Just My Weak A$$ Opinion.

GLTA

Appears you have read their projection chart wrong. You must place 3 Zeros behind the revenues.
For instance in 1210 net sales weren't $26,300 they were $26,300,000. Gross profit was $18,100,000.
quite a difference no?

Congrats to all and good luck tomorrow and beyond. Been in for a while and am happy with the results so far.
Been reading several posts regarding pps and the buyout price. Maybe someone brighter than myself could add to my theory as to all of the possible near term developments.
Is it viable for HBRM to put out a pr Tuesday outlining a solid plan going forward therefor increasing the sp? Then allow some form of a quiet period for the stock prior to a buyout offer being tendered by CHRI? Thus setting the new buyout pps that HBRM is looking for?

Any new insight on URRE? Chart looks like it should be set to go. But at the rate it is moving I could see it go even lower to test support at the 50 day (.93). TIA

New to board. Saw this over the weekend. GLTA
http://news.yahoo.com/britain-france-sign-nuclear-power-deal-summit-002037086.html

Would like your charting opinion on URRE. Looks like it should be ready to get to its next level based on MACD. However on Friday there was a quick drop in share price. Still finished up for the day but there was a shooting star doji formed for the day. Any thoughts or analysis would be greatly appreciated.

TIA

With all these upticks on the bid. In your opinion are the shorts being allowed to cover this way as the last I heard the shorts were on a reg show list?

That is an awesome find! Very interesting that it was not stated in their PR yesterday regarding libigel. No doubt this will have a positive effect in the future for BPAX.

We know it will be a government conspiracy to increase the number of docile males if Bio t gel is not approved by the FDA. Nice post and pic's.
GLTY

Looks like one of your favorite patterns is forming - "W"

BPAX - .90 printing! up 20+ % on day. PDUFA Feb. 14 still looks to continue move through the week.

BPAX at .78 quarter of average vol already traded. PDUFA on Feb 14

Thank You and Happy Holiday's to you and the rest of this solid board.

Thanks, just got through checking other stocks in the tanker shipping sector on google and for the most part they finished positive for the day. Hopefully a sign for things to come. I am pleased that it has been able to hold the support you pointed out.

DHT, anyone want to shed some light on how they see this play out? Hasn't been able to stay above the 20 day for three days straight now.

back to stock opinions. New to Orion's board been following for 3 months and almost tripled my money with some of the info you and others have provided. In DHT any suggestions on how to look at it? Hasn't been able to break and hold over the 20 DMA for three days. Been patiently waiting for it to hold above. TIA.

See where you are coming from regarding EEE. I do not know if that same $3 rule pertains to FTWR though. I believe EEE traded on the AMEX prior to delisting. Do not know if that exchange has the same criteria for maintaining good standing status as NASDAQ.

Didn't read that. Which PR are you referring to? If I am not mistaken, I thought the primary condition for trading on the NASDAQ was to trade above $1 for 10 consecutive trading days. Could be wrong on this one.

Shouldn't d-list to OCBB. Was trading over a dollar less than three months ago.

See there is a gap in the chart. Do you think that will come into play here? TIA

Just checked your post featuring the devils head. You are a visionary chartist. Keep up with all the awesome charting information. You are filling in a lot of gaps for me that the trading books have not.
Does the low volume with EMKR present any red flags. Currently on the sidelines waiting for a little more volume to signify strength. Opinions? TIA.

Saw this link posted. Would argue there is a difference between those paid to pump and those that do out of market activity. GLTA


http://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=69122311

Have read a few technical trading books and have yet to see the phenomenon known as the green eyed monster. Can you explain ? (LOL maybe, maybe not depending on it's validity)

P.S. Good to have you back!

Question for all the chartists out there, 50dma is inching closer to the 100dma. How significant is that to PEIX? TIA

Been on the sidelines myself for a while. What is the re-entry area you are looking for? TIA

Been looking at taking a position here. Buy signals are affirmed according to charts and volume. Are you seeing the same thing?
TIA

Thanks for the insight. On a side note I am in DUS# and I was reading your posts yesterday as you were informing the board regarding where it was headed. A few too many negative folks that didn't like the truth. Although I don't believe it got as low as you thought it might yesterday it got real close today. Good job on the call there and I for one appreciate your informative info. Has helped me learn more.

Hopefully this has leveled off and wants to go higher for a while. Do you see any trends in your chart that indicate it might do that? TIA.

This would make it hard for the shorts to cover once those averages cross, hence the ba$her$. Give them credence or don't, but at least know their motives.

What do you think, are we at the bottom yet?

will continue to wait and see what it does. Thanks