Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Thank you.
what i wonder is where exactly IS our money? it has to be somewhere! the money we invested here has to be somewhere. Has the CEO got it - ? Is he/are they entitled to have whatever is invested in BUNM? Doesn't that right entail certain responsibilities? Who enforces these things, checks on the money that is sitting somewhere, lost by the people who would like to take it back? hmm.
Spoke with Bob Farr today. Asked him what is going on with the stock. He mentioned in the course of the conversation that he doesn't look at the stock board. He said a European group is putting together the spinoff plan. Raising funds. It's closer.
ARSC is in production. I asked where; I am sure many of you know, but the production is occurring in Portland.
Mr. Farr is planning to visit Hawaii in early December and in fact will be quite near where I live and work since he is planning to visit Pearl Harbor. However I don't expect to meet him.
Thank you; your comment clarifies matters for me.
Wow... Am long in ARSC: my 2 cents is, with a little backgroiund, am just arriving to check out the board on a Sunday early evening after both wheels were stolen off my commuter bike. No wonder I woke up suddenly last night feeling slightly sick. Somehow I am still ok. I recommend listening to Alex Jones, www.infowars.com to put everything in perspective in terms of awfulness in general in our entire US situation. Please forgive my digression moderators and cancel the message if you must. Plan to call ARSC tomorrow about this, which I do not understand at all. I can certainly see something is horribly wrong. I've been following the board inadequately in recent weeks.
came over here to see what might be happening. am trying to figure out whether to sell at a loss before december. am wondering hmmmm....what is in the mind of someone purchasing shares - at least one sale was made 10/8. what might they know, why would someone buy...
Scottrade is listing the merger on its recent history of TCLIF as of just a few minutes ago; that is when i learned of it.
Hello: It can't get further up to date than the latest message from the CEO, which is not very current, if that's what is meant by does it include a dark period. I like what was done with the information we have: detailed presentation of BUNM shot through with positivity. Even if we are in a dark period from lack of news, I learned from examining the IBox, and reading it felt like turning on a light. I perked up on possible future scenarios including a buyout.
The IBox is outstanding. Thank you to all who worked on it.
i am going to check on that with them.
Why was the share structure diluted again?
- from a loyal arsc supporter
What was that September 27, 2010 news?
I am quite invested, but have not been coming around to ihub recently.
i'm long. has the ceo said why the dilution, again, of shares?
it's Sunday and this is one of two stocks showing green even though it is a weekend on my scottrade; i am not clear why yet.
Have not been following ARSC for 3-4 weeks.
Why were the shares increased - again - has any explanation been offered?
-heavily invested
Dear Pass: i would like to read the letter. has it been posted? i mean, is it up online? did you send it hardcopy registered mail return receipt requested, addressee signature requested? I have to laugh at what your grandmother said: NOTHING VENTURED NOTHING GAINED. Here we are, all hoping to become quadruple millionaires at the very least. Indeed, hope reigns supreme.
Thanks. That's helps - .
Have to go out pretty soon but will check by here and write if something worth saying comes to mind.
Here are some thoughts. I'm not going in any particular direction with them. I'm long, as you know.
1. do other .0001 stocks tend to get bought up to the tune of the number you have quoted for BUNM. I have noticed that they get played with. I haven't noticed that happening with BUNM.
2. It's possible to check whether institutional investors have bought. I haven't checked; I am pretty sure they are not buying; that's why.
3. Same thing with CEO buying shares.
I understand the wracking of the brain trying to come up with an explanation for BUNM's situation. Had been away for quite some time until recently I was alerted on another board of BUNM awakening. I still don't understand the background of that - it was within the last several days. After I had read it was waking up, I bought more shares. Before doing so, I read this board and could not find an explanation here. I went on and bought shares because of the low price per share. THEN, the price rose. Then, it sank back by the end of that day to its former position. But I learned, as you and others have pointed out, that the shares on the .0001 level are not plentiful. So, now we know that.
Hello Maverick. It would be safer if we at least had some word from the CEO. I have been a little involved with two other situations along the lines you propose here at IHub. I mean, where the attempt was made over weeks and weeks of time. Nothing came of it, or at least, I stopped caring. I still have the shares, the price doesn't change and is in the red, and I've stopped reading the boards.
What was in the last communication from the CEO, Mike?
Kool.
Your reply answers my q - a person can exit! Did you use a market order?
What happens when a market order is placed in this type of situation? That would mean, the order MUST be filled somehow, correct? If someone wanted to sell, assuming there was a bid, and used a market order, what would happen I'm wondering.
YES, OUI, SI.
Hello, Immie. i think I may know you from somewhere! ... Here I am having just bought in on Friday. OK; so let's see what happens. This is more than I generally pay per share for a stock. So far so good; it is up $100. ;)
Thank you for reminding us. :)
Hello IKauai from Honolulu. You are still a shareholder of QASP, and I caved and sold. You answered a question of mine back in June. Anyway, here I am, again, as of about 2 days ago. Now, I don't yet know quite what to make of the situation. The price is currently BELOW what I sold at, but this has happened twice before. I'm a prime example of someone who some would say should never have sold - however - when one does not have a lot of extra money to play around with, one cannot simply hold and watch - it was like a bleeding wound.
Now that QASP has a new management team I hope I am circumspect enough not to plunge back in without good cause. If you are willing to comment again, I'd be interested in reading what you have to say about QASP.
Second the post. Am sure that the CEO and COO are legitimate, genuine. We are a country so full of problems involving dishonesty that even if we seek and are somewhat succeeding in being relatively honest ourselves it becomes easy to be extremely suspicious. Fortunately it is usually impossible to fake a certain modesty which both men show by picking up the phone themselves.
Then, they go on to actually LISTEN to the person on the other end of the line even if the same questions are being asked over and over. And even if the person's investment is not significant in relative terms.
Go ARSC!
Thanks; all you write makes sense of course. Was that last quote your own opinion?
Thank you; it does help.
Stopped by after deliberate absence of quite some time after losing, for the second time, a lot of money on QASP.
At present I do not hold any shares. I have read through only a small part of the information given as links stickied above about Jeff Landreth. I may have misread, but I understand the new management team is from privately held corporation(s). Please correct me if I'm wrong and I hope to do more reading this weekend.
Will the new management care about the stock price and shareholders? Have they bought shares?
Is there evidence institutions are buying?
Thanks.
Thank you. You are right. I will try to do better. What happens is, I come across an angle that needs clarification after reading a message here. Then, I call. As I listen, I am listening with not a firm enough CONTEXT (read: DD, and following the company for a long period of time) to understand everything I am being told. Instead of being able to write about it intelligently, I end up with only bits of information.
The main point of the last message regarding the call with Mr. Neokomm is that: those who are waiting on the production of the batteries who have already placed their orders are content to wait.
In the course of the conversation I also learned whoever I was speaking with has been the head of a Boy Scout troop for 30+ years.
Neither of the heads of this company are hurting for money; each is financially secure independently of it. However, both parties understand that I as an ARSC investor am not in the same position - as financially secure as they are. My relatively small investment isn't going to make any difference to them. They understand their responsibility to me when they are saying to hang on. More exactly, "you are in good hands."
This is actually addressed to everyone.
I called ARSC today about this question brought up in the message I read this morning with the sobering thought that no buyer of the fuel cells would wait, this 21 million dollar back order is old and has been hanging around a long time (my paraphrase) ...or something to that effect. Seemed like something I needed to drive by the company.
I think it was CEO Frank Neokomm on the line.
I apologize for the muddled recollection but take it for whatever it is worth.
1. If you have seen other fuel cell websites, sites which list companies offering fuel cells, those cells are not actually available to buy. (again, take this for whatever it is worth and I may have misunderstood what I was hearing)
2. ARSC's HYDRA has a special and unique form of the cell.
3. The companies which are waiting are content to wait. They are companies that desire to third party sell the cell. They are fine with waiting.
Special characteristics of the cell - somehow include cold or low temperature. Some of you could say "DUH!!!"... I had to interrupt the flow in order to exit the call because my day as a teacher was beginning and the students were arriving.
No, from what I have heard from Mr. Farr. You could call him yourself, and he returns calls. The number is up in the I-box.
Yeah, maybe. I am perhaps relying too much on my positive feel here after several conversations. In the case of Mr. Farr, it would have had to be "bald-faced lies" that he told me over the phone. Possible, yes; likely, imho, no.
ARSC will include all shareholders of record on a certain date which has not been set and is not in the past.
Bob Farr called me back today as he does others who call him. It's been a long day at work but the main thing was that there is not a cut-off date set yet.
don't know why i assumed or didn't even consider anything else than that I'd be able to participate. we shall see.
oh My! I bought my shares more recently than that! Bob Farr brought up the spinoff in a conversation with me, and of course I assumed I'd be part of the group since I own shares now. I am going to try to reach him and will report back. No answer just now.
Could someone who is feeling OK with the number of shares available to buy please write in to enlighten me.
I'm holding and planning to add, but someone I know, one of the stock recommenders who has a business doing that, who intro'd me to ARSC, believes that the large number of shares, particularly the addition of 5 billion more recently, hurts the chance the stock will rise. He no longer believes the stock is a good investment because of this. Even though I have told him of my conversations with Mr. Farr and Mr. Neokomm - stock offered as part of collateral on loans(s)... He doesn't trust telephone conversations with CEO's of pink sheets, he has stated.
I do trust in this case. The share structure is the elephant in the room - for me anyway. Comments welcome.