It is not the stock, it is the OTC. The OTC runs to low cents, then flippers kill it. They leave those stocks and they never recover.

Has anyone been able to buy 1's lately?

Time to look at crypto instead of the OTC. I am thinking that a reason for the lack of liquidity in the OTC for the past few years is crypto. Money that used to be here went there. There have been no real runners in the OTC in the last few years and there have been plenty there. I am moving assets there in prep for the next bull run in crypto. That run will happen long before you see one in the OTC.

Again only a complete idiot thinks there is $2.50/share shorting in the OTC. Consider yourself complete.

You are truly ignorant of any reality. Those links refer to the bigger board stocks, not the OTC. There are no short stocks of any volume in the OTC because of the $2.50 per share cost to do so. No one, even idiots here that promote shorting to explain losses, put up that kind of cash to make peanuts.

How about the poor lemmings you conned into buying higher with clueless pumping?

Technically 9/28, but 9/30 is more usual for 6/30 annual reports.

You two are missing the point. Doesnt make a difference if the patents are acquired or not. Somebody has to pay to defend the patents. If the patents are acquired without being court tested, the value is lower because they will have all the legal costs.

Patents that are not court tested are not worth a lot by themselves. An acquirer othe p
atents will have the same issue. No one pays royalties just because you send them an invoice. If there has been no court test on validity, then they will hold payment until someone gets sued and loses. Just the way it is. Every major patent that I know of has been court tested, some valid, some not. And you are in big trouble if you are a small company without much money. Infringers know legal bills are cheaper than paying royalties.

Not until they sue someone for infringement and win. No one pays until a court enforces someone to pay.

You need sellers at .0001 to get any. Dont think there are many peeps totally throwing in the towel here yet to do that. It only takes a few shares at paint .0001 for it to show up. Doesnt mean you can buy there.

I don't think there were many if any buys at .0001.

We are good now. OTCM shows Pink, and removed the grace period. Full steam ahead.

August 14.

We still need Q2 fins to be current and escape the expert market. Hope Joe can get it done in time.

Do you know you can't buy when this hits expert market? Unless they submit every back set of fins in the next week or so, that is where we are headed.

I just noticed it over the weekend. We may get slammed because of the change in accounting. They haven't filed fins yet this year.

So it looks like we are headed to the expert market after the grace period expires.

I think we will be snoozing until the annual comes out in September.

I am going to stick this one out to the end of the year. If no news by then, will probably move on. And if there are no real runners in the OTC by then, will move on from the OTC.

This is the case all over the OTC. Stocks only move on news and nothing else. Even that doesn't do much because flippers then take the air out of any potential run. Been here now for a couple years and just treading water. Can't say much about other tickers either, the ones that run a little are scams pumped by front runners.

This is the annual. Not due until the end of September.

That is the problem when one is too stupid to read.

Why did you not listen to perfectly rational arguments that Nate was a scammer?

To own this stock, you have to have the patience of a rock, lol.

How to detect a scam 101- There are NEVER any third party proofs on anything claimed.

Nate's pancakes, sugar and chicken feet.

No one with anything close to having big money would touch this with a ten foot pole. That means that these idiots posting how big their stack is are lying to you.

Quite a few of us have been waiting since the PuriBlood deal for something here. What surprises me is that Caren hasn't said anything. She is usually chatty about the mergers she takes part in. More so that Tad ever has been.

#4) The only way a patent is validated is in court, not the patent office. No one pays until an infringer loses in court. Simple reason is that the patent office has no enforcement power, only a court does, so there is no need to pay for a patent until someone is enforced to do so.

Tell us that you are working for Nate. I cannot believe someone that has been on the boards as long as you is that stupid.

Plenty of tickers at that level hit pennies. All peeps are morons at birth, and some stay that way. Take the hint.

Morons are us? Look at a new one that can't understand the difference between restricted and unrestricted shares

Just a continuation of what I saw at Nate's. Go look and see where that one is now. Outright scams usually get a comment or two from me. Haven't missed on calling a scam for quite a while. Always remember, scammers are never reformed, they just find new scams.

The board. Did you not find comprehension in a dictionary? Like DD, you have to go look for it, instead of listening to clueless pumpers and CEO BS artists.

Tickers, hate spell check.

Go look up "comprehension" and get back to us.

How many patent tickets have you invested in?

If they only read your posts, they wouldn't know how much of a liar and cheat the CEO is. Then they will waste their money while this ticker heads back to trips. See Nate's ticker now. Same lies.

Ones prepared to run, not ones that are done.