Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Yes as it is required for Rule 144 that is used to remove the restricted legend.
Gamestop was shorted, it had short interest at 100%+ for months, it also had FTDs. GNCP on the other hand has zero short interest and zero FTDs,, so once again illustrating why this has nothing to do with share selling scam stock with its 210 Billion AS and its 58 Billion Float.
Except they dont own anything and it is clear in this piece of information provided:
If one thinks the DOJ is investigating a security that has zero shorts and zero FTDs, well one is sadly mistaken, that is a DEAD END.
There were zero shorts here in this stock, not sure what short selling has to do with this SEC Suspended security. By the way how is that Suspension Reversal Letter coming along? Lol... can you provide us an example of such a letter from another security?
Yet nothing to do with GNCP, once again all the stocks of interest were shorted, they had 100%-140% short interest at times and also there FTDs. GNCP has zero Short Interest and ZERO FTDs.
This stock on the other hand has a 210 Billion AS and has dumped 58 Billion shares into the market, over 40 Billion in the last year in fact.
There is zero business here, along with zero revenues and zero profits, pretty clear why this is a .0001 stock.
Abusive...lol.. the actual definition of abusive short isn't short volume. The SEC clearly defines it and its not as you presented it.
Short volume is meaningless data.
No there wont be, it will be the usual crap of some recently formed Lumb Co in Wyoming or Bauman pile of shit corp with the same worthless BLM claims.
Enmjoy!
Aint your retail types I will tell you that, but hey when one holds a freshly minted free trading unrestricted cert hot off the GNCP press... well Alpine is your man.
Lol....oooooookkk....let's go back to 2104, 2016 or 2018...website is coming....lol...material events are coming. How did those Adult Arcades being pumped as casinos turn out...lol.. website... ba ha ha ha ha ha ha ha..
No actually you do not, an announcement of a potential material event in a disclosure has no regulatory weight.
It is worse than that, it is 56 Billion.
No, pretty obvious what he has stated there doesnt exist a short position here in this stock as proven by regulatory reports. There has to be an FTD aggregate to have a short position in a stock. That is a FACT that cannot be steered around with opinion pieces from 2004.
Once again nothing has happened, an investigation is not a charge of illegal activity. A bunch of amateur traders who recently bought into an overhyped market based on Redit users pumping and touting shitty stock that eventually collapsed and are now crying foul is not evidence of illegal activity.
The fact that most went to the Internet to try to find something that would fit their narrative of why their "investment" has failed and locating articles from times before current Reg SHO is quite hilarious and desperate. But hey, good on them for convincing the DOJ into looking at this, because when the conclusion comes along yet again, that it wasnt naked short selling that caused the fall of the stock.... well it will be ignored and now the DOJ will be implied as being in on it as well.
Predictable.
Who's truth? Internet conspiracy theories due to unawareness of how stock transactions work so they fill in the holes with made up jargon to explain what they fail to understand? Explain how such a process of not delivering shares to the buyer that the electronic settlement system still records a credit to the account. Explain why there doesnt exist a single instance in which a person selling said OTC securities has never once not had cash in their account from the sales transaction....
Exactly fictitious HISTORY, anything from say the current Reg SHO period after 2009? Absolutely not, of course anything from a reputable regulatory source on the topic? Of course not, like many things in the OTC world, made up terms to deflect the real issues here in stock like this. No business, no revenues, no profits and absolutely no operational evidence along with explosive share structures totaling in the billions for 14 years and debt conversions that provide zero cash to the company. But it is short sellers...lol.. not a single share shorted of significance, not a single FTD and yet real stocks with real companies that are actually shorted in some cases up to 140% of their float and for months and have FTD's, but GNCP has none of that... Makes perfect sense.
No it is not, it is a fictituos made up term by Internet conspiracy theorists.
I dont need patience here, GNCP does it all on their own, delivering ZERO as I have stated and for 14 years...lol
Show where it has been stated that they are investigating this security or any OTC security.. there is no such evidence, in fact they have mentioned the likes of GME and AMC, which are not OTC securities. So lets stick to the facts here, those stocks had in some cases 140% short Interest and maintained over 100% short interest for months and also had FTDs. This stock has zero % short interest and zero FTDs, they are not even remotely the same. So enjoy!
No I meant what I said CNS as the Feds do not give 2 shits about this scam and its non existent short conspiracies. No FTD they have no cares about this security. They are looking at actual shorted securities, might want to read up on it and not cherry pick and apply information to this scam turd security.
You mean CNS, feds have nothing to with FTDs.
No FTDs here so no worries.
There are no naked shorts, you must have FTDs to have the possibility of naked shorts and well GNCP has ZERO FTDs.
A fun FACT about this scam ticker, it is just a printing press of newly minted shares clearly and transparently reported by the Transfer Agent.
Lol.. Great find....lol.. yes a recent SEC complaint with Baumann for creative writing...lol.. More worthless mines that are BLM unpatented properties of ZERO value...lol
Wow what a find, a con artist and worthless BLM mines
Yep, kick it further down the road and hope people buy shares....lol
Yet back then there were not 57 Billion shares in the market, with another 56 Billion freshly minted new shares waiting to be dumped. You cannot apply the past to current situation.
Its a nothing burger, it certainly has nothing to do with GNCP.
There are zero shorts in GNCP, no FTDs, so the "sting" wont uncover jackshit for GNCP.
It is comical that anyone believes there are hundreds of thousands tied up in filings and professional fees here annually...lol.. On average as you stated there are $5K in annual expenses in paying for public disclosures and attorneys fees. Lumb dumped 40 Billion shares last year, at an average of .0001 per share he still would have made $4M, but the average price was much higher than that.
Explain why it is not "Cheap"? What do you think it costs to maintain Pink Current with unaudited disclosures that are self prepares?
No such thing as "Uplisting", stocks on the OTC Markets are "QUOTED" only stock on an EXCHANGE are "listed". OTC Markets is not an exchange, it is a MARKET.
No Form 211 to be on the QB.
Glad we cleared this up.
Dont forget this important link:
https://www.sec.gov/litigation/suspensions/2021/34-93665.pdf?utm_medium=email&utm_source=govdelivery
Similar to this "SEC Suspension Announcement Reversal"
Could you show us one of those "reversals"
Yet none of which exist here in this stock, NO SHORT INTEREST and NO FAILS TO DELIVER, there is zero shorting occurring here or ever for that matter.
Nobody cares about unaware and unsophisticated investors who got a Robinhood account bought into market hype and meme stocks that are now left holding the bag and crying foul that they are in losses.
A whole lot of nothing is going to come of this and this stock is not a part of that.
So enjoy!
Pretty clear that INSD is not as there is no short interest of significant value and well the FTD reports requires going back to the previous December reporting to locate a single FTD of which it was a whole + or - 100 shares which settled on December 20th. So that settles all types of shorts.. Short Interest, Naked Short Selling, Abusive Naked Short Selling, not a real issue with INSD.
Short Interest
Fails to Deliver Data
SETTLEMENT DATE CUSIP SYMBOL QUANTITY (FAILS) DESCRIPTION PRICE
20211215 45783B103 INSD 116 INSTADOSE PHARMA CORP COM (NV) 3.1
20211216 45783B103 INSD 87 INSTADOSE PHARMA CORP COM (NV) 2
20211217 45783B103 INSD 129 INSTADOSE PHARMA CORP COM (NV) 2.76
Oooops nothing to do with this share selling scam of a stock...lol
False, not a single share short here, the probe is into stocks that were shorted, this stock was never shorted. Not any short interest of significant value ever here and once again not a single FTD.