https://youtu.be/TD83A0SGkFU?t=13
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
GAGA
but it becomes community research which is a good way to guard against misinformation.
no, it isn't. tell that to the cmkx folks.
lolol. i have been on this site for over 24 years. one of the first things i heard was "do your own DD".
are you considering eliminating the grandfathered status of legacy users and limiting their privileges?
Wish that part of the equation would be made obvious.
my goodness, how much more obvious can it get. when finra does not process a corporate change request they always state why and ask for specific additional information. ALWAYS. mark is just plain lying.
sounds like a plan. many of your invitees are in their 70's and 80's and look forward to something new.
you didn't take me seriously, did you? nobody should.
who is amit, ceo of investorshub?
I don't have specific information about individuals who are CEOs of companies like InvestorsHub. However, I can help you find information about publicly traded companies and their executives. If you have a specific publicly traded company in mind, please provide the name or ticker symbol, and I can retrieve relevant information for you.
Related Questions
What is the background of Amit, CEO of InvestorsHub?
What are the key accomplishments of Amit as the CEO of InvestorsHub?
How has InvestorsHub performed under the leadership of Amit as CEO?
i would happily trade my balance for 3 free deletions.
hey amit, what's up with my plus one's?
i thought that about myself as well. apparently he has never read me.
well, i do have to say that clem never asked me to join a club.
seriously? a new club?
Tevano Systems Holdings Inc.
Status
suspended
T2
https://thecse.com/listings/tevano-systems-holdings-inc/
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO EFFECTUATE SERVICE OF PROCESS ON DEFENDANTS
Plaintiffs, by and through undersigned counsel, move for entry of an Order granting an
extension of time to Effectuate Service of Process on Defendants. In support thereof, Plaintiffs
state the following:
1. Plaintiff’s counsel are in the process of domesticating three subpoenas to three
corporate entities in California.
2. Because the entities are California entities, all three entities’ counsel requested
Plaintiffs’ counsel to domesticate the subpoenas in California per the California
Discovery Act and California Code of Civil Procedure §§ 2029.300 and 2029.350.
3. This processing time for California subpoenas to be domesticated and issued takes
about 45 days.
4. Once issued, we will have to reserve the California entities then wait to receive their
requested records.
5. Due to the unknown identity of the defendants, upon receipt of the entities’ records,
further skip tracing may be necessary to then attain new summons to serve those
individuals.
Filing # 203229474 E-Filed 07/24/2024 11:54:38 AM
FILED: COLLIER COUNTY, CRYSTAL K. KINZEL, CLERK, 07/24/2024 11:54:38 AM
6. For the reasons above, Plaintiffs’ counsel requires extended time to locate and serve
defendants.
Plaintiffs respectfully request that the initial service deadline of August 16, 2024, may be
extended as follows:
Original
Deadline
Extended Deadline
Deadline For Effectuate
Service of Process on
Defendants:
08/16/2024 12/14/2024
7. This motion is done in good faith and not intended to cause delays and is not prejudicial
to any parties.
WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs move for entry of an Order granting an extension of time to
Effectuate Service of Process on Defendants
and all other relief this court deems just and
appropriate.
👏 🤩❤️⚰️⚱️
mark always fancied himself a good creative writer.
correct.
lol.
don't flatter yourself, jake. jackass.
At some point, this kid might have some serious problems
ya' mean like prison?
when they could make a perfectly efficient humble Toyota esque vehicle.
you apparently have no idea what it costs toyota to bring a new vehicle to market. i'll give you a hint, it's a lot more money than this scam will ever see.
So killing your political opponent is part of the core duties of the POTUS
it is NOW
that's what i'm thinkin'.
If Biden were to commission the assassination of Clarence Thomas, would that be considered an "Official Act"?
He'd have to make it part of his "official duties". Alito might be easier. Biden could get him for Martha-Ann's flags. Hang him high!!
where do i sign the petition?
hey conman, you were wrong then and you're wrong now.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=137540358
Looks as though Israel looking favorable on oil and gas.
too bad zion has none.
did you forget about the 2 justins?
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/04/14/us/justin-pearson-justin-jones-tennessee.html
this scam was a nyse listed company. hard to imagine.
https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=158039104
lololol. did you see what happened to another scam basile was promoting?
SEC Charges Meta Materials and Former CEOs with Market Manipulation, Fraud and Other Violations
https://www.sec.gov/news/press-release/2024-77
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
2024-77
Washington D.C., June 25, 2024 —
The Securities and Exchange Commission today filed charges against Meta Materials Inc. and its former CEOs, John Brda and George Palikaras. The company has agreed to settle the SEC’s charges in an administrative proceeding, while the SEC’s litigation against Brda and Palikaras will proceed in federal district court.
The SEC’s complaint against Brda and Palikaras alleges that, as a result of a concerted market manipulation scheme, Meta Materials, a Nevada corporation headquartered in Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada, raised $137.5 million from investors in an at-the-market (ATM) offering in June 2021 immediately prior to the merger of Brda’s Torchlight Energy Resources Inc. and Palikaras’ Metamaterial Inc. that formed Meta Materials.
The SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, alleges that Brda and Palikaras planned and conducted the manipulative scheme that included, among other things, issuing a preferred stock dividend immediately before the merger. The complaint alleges that Brda and Palikaras told certain investors and consultants—and hinted via social media—that the dividend would force short sellers to exit their positions and trigger a “short squeeze” that would artificially raise the price of the company’s common stock. The SEC further alleges that Brda and Palikaras also misrepresented the company’s efforts to sell its oil and gas assets and distribute proceeds to preferred stockholders, giving investors a false impression of the value of the dividend. While investors held or bought the company’s common stock to receive the dividend, the complaint alleges, the company was cashing in by selling $137.5 million in an ATM offering at prices that the company, Brda, and Palikaras knew were temporarily inflated by their manipulative scheme. “We have two days,” the complaint alleges Brda told Palikaras after the first day of the ATM offering, “to take advantage of the squeeze...”
“The conduct we allege was a sophisticated, yet brazen plan by a public company and its former CEOs to purposely mislead investors in the company’s stock,” said Eric Werner, Director of the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office. “This conduct is particularly alarming because it involves public company CEOs who were more concerned with ‘burning the shorts’ than creating long-term value for shareholders.”
The SEC’s complaint charges Brda and Palikaras with violating the antifraud and proxy disclosure provisions of the federal securities laws, and charges Brda with aiding and abetting Meta Materials’s violations of the reporting, internal accounting controls, and books and records provisions. The complaint seeks permanent injunctions, officer-and-director bars, and civil penalties from both defendants. The complaint also seeks disgorgement with pre-judgment interest from Brda.
The SEC also instituted a separate administrative proceeding against Meta Materials, entering a settled order finding that Meta Materials violated the antifraud, reporting, internal accounting controls, and books and records provisions of the federal securities laws. Without admitting or denying the findings, Meta Materials was ordered to cease and desist from violations of the relevant provisions of the federal securities laws and to pay a $1,000,000 penalty.
The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Christopher Rogers and Ty Martinez of the SEC’s Fort Worth Regional Office under the supervision of Samantha Martin, B. David Fraser, and Mr. Werner. The SEC’s litigation against Brda and Palikaras will be conducted by Patrick Disbennett and supervised by Keefe Bernstein.
A separate Commission investigation regarding subsequent events related to Meta Materials (MMTLP) remains ongoing. If you are an individual with information related to this investigation or any other related suspected fraud and you wish to contact the SEC staff, please submit a tip at SEC.gov.
good article. unfortunately most of the people who need to read it, won't.
basile law firm. lolololol
oh, you thought i was serious. well, newbauer announced the plan back in september or october so it could happen any day now. or never. i'm gonna go with never.
lol. what stages are there?