Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
Register for free to join our community of investors and share your ideas. You will also get access to streaming quotes, interactive charts, trades, portfolio, live options flow and more tools.
I have three questions for you senator…
1. Why is it that when someone doesn’t understand or exercise a process, they discount it as impossible or insinuate that it is a lie?
2. What would I have to gain by telling a lie about something so petty?
3. Did you read the warning I post on this board two days ago?
I think not. If you did, maybe you would have noticed what I was explaining about the trading pattern SSEV was developing. It was inevitable the PPS was going to retract if there isn’t additional catalyst to move it up. Message #4995, also notice that I mentioned the website update. (Damn that ESP!}
It’s not about timing, it’s about human behavior. It go’s like this…. Everyone rushes in to buy. (Greed) PPS becomes over bought to the point of irrational exuberance. Buying subsides, volume dries when rational thinking takes over. Then price retracts over time and then fear takes over as their portfolio’s value diminishes. Then the fear produces an over-sold condition and PPS plummets. Then the shrewd and rational investor buys in low. Then the greed creeps back in raising the PPS to a rational price level with a new base formed. (Shake and Bake).
The only timing involved is selling after PPS is irrational and having cash in hand during the fear phase. Not ESP, experiance.
If you don’t understand what I just explained, just revert back to …”Talk is Cheep!” and continue to insult others.
Or you can play the Warren Buffet game and buy and hold. (I bet you there isn’t a single pink penny stock in the Hathaway portfolio.)
Schlumpy
Sure Pal. You give me WAY to much credit.
It’s Friday, traders don’t like to hold volatile stocks going into the weekend. This is a fact and if you have any experience trading pinkies, you would know this to be a fact. When I saw that the PPS didn’t more on the revamped website, I knew that SSEV was in for a good “Shake and Bake”. All of this meaningless pumping over the last three days only held the price up on diminishing volume.
I personally played this pinky the way a pinky should be played…If you get a run of 600% gain…SELL! It’s over bought! No amount of wishful thinking will move it higher, only more creditable news will.
Don’t blame me for YOUR inaction. I only shared with everyone what I was reading into the PPS and Volume.
Maybe next time you will listen to reason opposed to dreams.
And I do believe SSEV will make it to a penny, it’s just needs to earn it’s stripes.
I do wish you good luck with your investment / trade.
I tried to warn you guys!
It was so obvious that the PPS wasn’t going to hold.
Thanks for letting me back in @ $.0020.…NICE!
Ok, now for the meaningless pumping.
Goooooo…SSEV!
Waiting for that news, merger, buy-out, contract or whatever pushes this Great Company to $.01
Oversold @ $.002 Now you BUY!
Oh I’m So Sorry for the error. 6B AS opposed to 7.5B. AS. Do you understand what authorized share count even means?
It just means that the company says it won’t dilute Your shares any more. WOW! That is big news!
Do you want me to blow smoke up your Pumpnass, or do you want the truth?
“It’s going to hit .0040 by the end of the day! BUY…BUY… BUY… NOW!
That feel better?
There’s going to be a whole-lot-ta {{{{SHAKING}}}} going on!
I’ll give SSEV some credit, it held up at .0032 range longer then I thought it would, but after reviewing the updated website, I would have to say the cheerleaders expectations were set a little high.
Now were waiting for earnings, sure ok. Oh, maybe the grant. Maybe.
Like I said before, SSEV will hit .0025 before .0040. Folks I’m not bashing SSEV, I I’m just explaining the tail of the tape. Buyers have dried up!
Most of you gained 600-800% and that isn’t enough for you? Pigs get slaughtered!
Remember the true reason SSEV went up…Humphries resigned and new CEO said Authorized Share reduced from 10B down to 7.5B. That only means that the company promises not to dilute that shares. That’s it and that news adds No additional value.
Believe it or not, I believe SSEV will eventually make it back to a penny or better, I just don’t believe that wishful thinking and cheerleading will get us there.
With that said, SSEV is a trade, not an investment. That’s what you do with these pink stocks…Trade them!
UWRL the Price is right for picking!
The PPS of UWRL swings from .0025 to .0080 on low volume. It's a great one to TRADE.
I would say you did pretty good on the trade. You helped yourself to what….20% increase in shares, helped the volume today and got a little thrill out of the play.
Some of the cheerleader on these penny stocks really don’t have the tenacity to make a play like that. Most are afraid they will miss out on the “Gap-up”. Sometimes you do, most times you don’t.
I was impressed with today’s volume and the PPS was maintained. This tells me there will be better days to come, but SSEV will need a catalyst for another gap-up. My personal opinion is SSEV PPS will see $.0025 before we see .0040 (with no news).
Good luck to yeah!
Unless you have more current information, I would draw the conclusion that….
“Humphries is the majority shareholder of SSEV. Under the terms of the SSEV purchase, the shareholders of HMSI and HHHI will take a combined 30% of SSEV.”
________________________________________________________________________
ADDISON, TX -- (Marketwire) -- 08/24/09 -- Systems Evolution, Inc. (PINKSHEETS: SSEV) announced today that it has acquired Hoss Motor Sport, Inc. (HMSI) and Highline Hydrogen Hybrids, Inc. (HHHI).
SSEV's Chief Executive Officer Steven Humphries made the announcement today saying, "As a result of the termination of the Sympowerco, Inc. deal on Friday (8/21) we worked over the weekend we were able roll HMSI and HHHI into Systems Evolution."
In May of 2009 Steven Humphries entered into a Letter Of Intent to assign his interest in HMSI and HHHI to Sympowerco in exchange for 51% of SYMW's common stock. On July 26, 2009 the parties executed a Share Exchange Agreement. However, the transaction was never consummated and the agreement was terminated by all parties on Friday, August 21, 2009.
Humphries is the majority shareholder of SSEV. Under the terms of the SSEV purchase, the shareholders of HMSI and HHHI will take a combined 30% of SSEV.
Humphries added, "These are two great companies with tremendous potential and I am pleased that we were able to close the deal so quickly so that we can move forward with the development plans."
This news release contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When used in this release, words such as "estimate," "expect," "anticipate," "projected," "planned," "forecasted" and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are, by their very nature, no guarantees of Earthworks Entertainment's future operational or financial performance, and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this release. Due to the risks and uncertainties, actual events may differ materially from current expectations. The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
CONTACT:
Steven Humphries
972-248-2244 Ext 106
Source: Marketwire (August 24, 2009 - 3:12 PM EDT)
No... the new CUSIP number alone does not automatically issue shares to new company.
The new CUSIP number must be granted and on the application when applying to FINRA for name and symbol change. The CUSIP number is an identification number granted by the SEC.
Posted by: skyrocketinsight Date: Friday, March 05, 2010 12:04:41 PM
In reply to: None Post # of 4794
Boy do I wish I would have sold yesterday. This is manure after the good news.
========================================================
Need I say More?
Reality Check!
Their dumping at small profits? Are you kidding me?
Everyone that has been holding SSEV over the past 7 days has made a killing. Some made 600-800%.
I expected to see the PPS go down today. It’s called profit-taking, and I suggest you do the same. Sure the PPS may go up a little more, but reality is that there is a whole lot less upside then downside at this moment in time.
The next move up will need to come from fundamental changes. The only thing I see coming in the near future is the website update. Then I think we will see another gap up. Otherwise, nothing is coming. Symbol change will take at least 6 weeks, maybe longer considering Humphries is the majority shareholder in SSEV.
I believe SSEV is going to make it to penny-land in the long run, I just know when a companies shares are over-bought and the new investor pool dries up at some point. That when you sell, hold the cash for the pull-back and buy back in when the shares appears to be in an over-sold state.
Whatever your strategy, good-luck with your investments.
Sonic, Good luck with the email to FINRA. I don’t think they will or are at liberty to give out that information.
Personally, I believe SH sent in the name change, however, I’m beginning to think FINRA doesn’t like the way the business structure is set-up with two companies (one private and one public) with the exact same names and chartered in two different states. This to me is a blatant attempt to confuse the investing public thinking the company is larger than what it really is. Also, as I have questioned in a previous message, “what happens to the equity in the public company if it is de-listed?” A business arrangement as such would surly make it easy to divert value to the private company and the bond holders, preferred and common share holders would have nothing to recover from the public company.
Until SH returns to a FULL disclosure policy, he is going to have a difficult time recovering his honor. This alone leads me to believe that his aim is to run the company into the ground. He is showing absolutely no interest in making this company succeed.
Looking forward to your findings,
Schlumpy
A Call For ACTION!
Hey Steve Humphries… Now is a time for Action. If you can’t get FINRA to approve the name change, may I suggest that you fly your small plane into the side of their headquarters’ building.
Don’t worry about the manifesto, we already know your story.
Note: To those whom take this message seriously, get a life. It a JOKE! (just like SH as CEO)
Check out SNDY…Value play.
I did the DD and found it is trading @ 1/3 rd. book value. The company has a nice stable product line with class A clientele list. The PPS is $.0014 and has been receding for the past 120 days from a high of $.03.
Take a look at it, maybe a winner.
Bid 5@.0012 / Ask 1@.0013,2@.0015
We should be receiving a press report from the new CEO soon.
This is usually the case when we have new blood at the helm. They give us that rosy outlook on the company’s future ect…
I expected the PPS to recede after that wonderful explosion. WOW!
I first bought in @ .0006 sold yesterday @ .0022 and bought back in today @ .0012.
I’m a little surprised it pulled back that fast but I think the company has a bright future without Humphries. I think the move to replace him was a strategic one, they needed to isolate him from the one company that has a chance to make it, because all hell going to hit the fan from the way he is running the other companies.
Hell, I wouldn’t doubt the FED. Grant was in jeopardy because of Humphries involvement with SSEV.
Thank God he’s gone!
Good luck guys see yah @ .0030+
Schlumpy
Question #8.) Cabal Communications...
How can there be two companies called CABAL Communications one public and one private and what is the percentage mix?
DLAD Share-holders Unite!
I have a few straight forward questions to ask the CEO Steven Humphries and would like a straight forward answer to ALL of them, and I’m confident other share holder would like to here the answers as well.
1.) What percent of Spectrum Broadcasting do WE own as a Public company and how much is owned as a Private company?
2.) If trading on DLAD is halted, will the Private company take possession of the Public companies assets?
3.) What are the financials of the newly acquired companies? RED-BLACK ? Value?
4.) If FINRA doesn’t approve name change, then what?
5.) What are the concerns FINRA has with name change?
6.) Will we see management changes soon? ( It appears to be a winning trend with SSEV.)
7.) Knowing that DLAD is a non-reporting status company, Can we get a little more direct information on how you are spending our money?
Share holders, If you have additional questions, please post them on this board. Also try to keep them professional (Non attacking or offensive, it really doesn’t help).
Last point, Let us not forget how this company is chartered. We as share holders own this company and we should and will be heard by the management. If not, we as a group can make changes to the management as we see fit.
Until we get answers, no one is going to sink another dollar into the black-hole, because nothing comes out!
Do the right thing here and now Steve Humphries, Tell us the truth to the questions we raise or WE shall have no other options at hand other then to remove you from office and get someone in the that will.
Schlumpy
How low will the PPS go?
The share price of SNDY is fading away, but how low will it go until serious investors notice the company is a buy.
Back in September I was fortunate to make a ton of money on this POS. back when the PPS hit $.03 , I sold @ .028, .0245 and .021 I walked away with a 600% gain in three days. This company appears to be doing all the right things a growth company should be doing, but they can’t seem to keep the fire going. Why?
I believe this company’s PPS is far under valued @ .0014 and I don’t believe it is going to stay this low for long. OS is a little over 954M (x) .0014 = $1.34M and the share holder equity as of 9/09/09 was $3,134, 201.00 . Am I missing something here, or the value of book value really between $.004-.0045.
Fuzzy math? I don’t think so. Help me out, what am I missing?
Nice job...You should buy up some of that cheep DLAD with your profits. News soon, going to run like SSEV!
I'm still here. Nothing to say!
Feds on humphries back...yeah-right.
I'm just waiting for Humphries to pass control to Spectrum Broadcasting president before the Feds catch him.
Then will see $$$
I bet PPS going down.
News about increasing Authorized shares and then they want to reverse spilt the stock. To me, this sounds like massive dilution to rise cash. My guess it to set-up manufacturing facilities. They need to have the plant up and running to get phase three approval.
I like the fact that the company would be spending cash on capital assets, just not on my dime. I’ll wait for the RS and PPS drop before I feel good about investing in GOVX.
JMHO.
No it’s not ok with me to accept a company going bankrupt, however, it is not uncommon for a company to leverage themselves out to purchase capital assets such as another company (private or not) with the intention to enhance the operations with the ultimate goal to improve profitability, that ok in my book.
You continue to imply that Humphries is buying private companies to divert shareholders equity for his personal gain. Am I correct with this assumption? If not, what the problem? Please explain your point more clearly.
A corporation can buy a private company just as any other entity does. Why would they be limited from buying one. This happens in the business world.
A corporation see value in a private company, then buys it or a part of it, treats it as an asset like any other asset. The company may produce losses or profits and the are reported on the parent companies financial reports.
What I think you maybe suggesting is, that the CEO is diverting funds from corporation thru private company to individuals thus neglecting shareholders rights, would be considered “Money Laundering” and that would be a serious problem.
There are strict accounting rules management must follow to avoid penalty including jail time.
Bottom line is…Corporations buy private companies and there is nothing wrong with this practice.
Question…Does anyone know of a regulation or policy enforced by FINRA pertaining to corporation's name changes which restricts company from changing company’s name more then once in a twelve month period?
I have done some research on this issue and I couldn’t find anything restricting name change. Maybe someone here has witnessed a company that changed name more then once in twelve months, or knows of written restrictions which would apply to DLAD.
Just a thought, but maybe that’s what we are waiting for.
On the dark side… Maybe there is a restriction to R/S within a one year period.
Any thoughts?
I saw it also. It changed back in the last 25 minutes of trading.
I use Etrade and there is a ASK price @.0001 / 50,000
The level II removes the Bid / Ask at the end of the day. Check another pink symbol and see if they are blank also. I checked SSEV and there is no Bid / Ask.
Doctor Humphries, it’s about time you use the deliberator to get this company going again. The heart beat is hardly noticeable. We may lose the patent soon if you don’t act soon!
Maybe another shot of FINRA will do?
I didn’t even notice that your post was pulled until you pointed it out. You give me way too much credit.
Personally, I don’t care what you write, others can see what you’re all about and the truth is far from your messages.
I just want to know why you seem to be so obsessed with singling me out in your post. Is it because I lost a ton of money on this position and I refuse to join your angry attack camp?
I have no problem with the truth, I just can’t handle it when people mislead others with halve-truths.
With that said, I’ll be praying for you.
Only on word came into mind after reading your last posting…
PATHETIC, simply pathetic.
How is going to work out for people who bought at .0007 to .0008. The same way it is going to work out for everyone else who bought at all other entry points.
The point I was making is DLAD was a one trick pony with the CRM software. SH. sold it off before it’s value became $0. (I’m a bit surprised he found a buyer.) Humphries claimed to reduce debt and purchased the Sports Page Weekly, begin developing another monthly publication and bought an interest in Spectrum Communications, which is the company buying the radio stations, this in my opinion is reorganizing the company. Will the new formed company now called Cabal Communications Corp. be profitable? I really don’t know, but it sure looks to me that it has more promise then the old business plan.
I too purchased some of my holding @ .0007 (10% of 130M Shares) will I and others recover our cost? Honestly, probably not in the next 12 months.
As for the 20B. authorized shares, all I know is what Humphries put out in the press release, and on Dec. 23, 09 he claimed 8.7B outstanding with 20B AS. Is he dumping or trading shares for equity? Dumping shares maybe, he appears to have done this in recent past, as for trading shares for equity. I sure hope so.
As for a R/S, with 20B. AS. I think he will do a R/S, but not until he can prove the company is making progress toward profitability, otherwise the share price will deteriorate back down to .0001 again and the R/S will be in vein.
Here’s how I see this company playing out, and it’s only my opinion. DLAD get approval from FINRA in the near future, PPS increases to .0002 and holds steady with an occasional .0003. Then SH. Delivers some good news thru Q-reports showing progress toward profitability, but the debt offsets the gains. We may see a spike in volume to the .0003’s but it won’t hold. Back to the steady .0002. Then SH. Buys another radio station and gets the health and fitness magazine launched in the second quarter, this news will get us to a steady .0003 and occasional .0004. (But this is just my wishful thinking.)
One more thought, I think we may see a request to transfer DLAD Shares to the new company Cabal Comm. In order to establish a true outstanding share amount. I believe that DLAD has been naked short sold after the last R/S and the sellers never materialized shares to cover. Who really knows for sure, but the transfer process will clean up the mess if there really is one.
Thanks for the reply.
I would have to agree with your assumptions about Humphries and his business practices. I am beginning to think the same way, however there are something’s that maybe out of his control.
I think FINRA has concerns about the ongoing business, twice they have held up the name change pending questions (Per press releases). FINRA must be buying into Humphries explanations, they haven’t halted trading yet. Humphries also spent over 20K on lawyer fees in Q3 09. I would assume to cover anticipated skeptical questions from FINRA.
Personally I don’t like how Humphries is running the business but I think he is sharp enough to cover his ass. I just like to see him concentrate on one business at a time and make it grow into a profitable one.
As for DLAD / CABAL Communication I truly believe SH is trying to reorganize the company into a media entity. As for the dilution, and the debt, It maybe insurmountable but not impossible.
I am going to hold on a little while to see how this plays out. We all had the opportunity to dump on Feb. 1st. But I choose to roll the dice one more time. The volume speaks for it’s self with the last press release…There’s a lot of people waiting for this thing to pop.
Let’s hope Humphries comes clean on the deal, I would sure hate to see the trading halted If that happens, then we all lose everything we have in it. But that’s better then letting a crook go free to continue taking advantage of trusting investors.
Best of luck with your endeavors, Schlumpy
Acsell, you said that you had filed a complaint to the SEC the other day, I’m just curious what you list as a violation. Would you please share that with us?
My best guess would be “False and misleading statements” and possibly something to do with Authorized shares. SEC requires accuracy in order to expedite complaint.
Also, if you would, please keep us updated on investigation process. I don’t know if your actions will do any good, but the heat may get Humphries to disclose more detail about the businesses transactions.
Thanks, Schlumpy
I think what we have here is a failure to communicate with a dash of...
One-upmanship is the art or practice of successively outdoing a competitor.
The term originated as the title of a book by Stephen Potter, published in 1952[1] as a follow-up to the The Theory and Practice of Gamesmanship (or the Art of Winning Games without Actually Cheating) (1947)[2] and Lifemanship titles in his series of tongue-in-cheek self-help books, and film and television derivatives, that teach various "ploys" to achieve this.
In that context, the term refers to a satiric course in the gambits required for the systematic and conscious practice of "creative intimidation", making one's associates feel inferior and thereby gaining the status of being "one-up" on them.
This satire of self-help style guides manipulates traditional stuffy British conventions for the gamester, all life being a game, who understands that if you're not one-up, you're one-down. Potter's unprinciple principles apply to almost any possession, experience or situation, deriving maximum undeserved rewards and discomforting the opposition.
Viewed seriously, it is a phenomenon of group dynamics that can have significant effects in the management field: for instance, manifesting in office politics. The term has been extended to a generic, often punning, extension upmanship used for any assertion of superiority:
The small lots traded is not Humphries buying shares as implied by some of the posters liberally assuming as such, but they are parts of larger trades. Sometimes it’s the buyers lots are larger then the lot up next for sale at the ask price, some buys are broke-up in lots below 10,000,000 (999,999 x 10 + 10share lot to complete 10M buy.
An unsophisticated investor attempting to purchase
5,000 shares of your firm’s stock may receive what
is referred to as an automatic execution or a partial fill
of a larger limit-price day order for 100 or 200 shares.5
Here, for example, is one message:
OT: I can’t believe that someone bought $2 worth of
stock (100 shares) and paid a minimum $8 dollar (sic)
commission.6
This unsophisticated investor failed to understand
that an automatic execution caused the transaction for
100 shares of a stock selling at two cents per share. This
was a partial fill from a larger order but was misinterpreted
as a completed trade. These transactions are
often blamed on MMM but result only from a buyer’s
failure to place an all-or-none order.
http://www.imanet.org/pdf/1832.pdf (Stock Chat Message board)
Good news about DLAD…
My position I have in DLAD is the only stock that I hold in my portfolio that held it’s value today!
WOW…That’s something to feel good about!
Goooooooo DLAD / CABAL Communications!
Blah…blah …blah, you just keep repeating yourself again and again, however you continue to hold a long position of 5M shares in DLAD.
You’re not stuck with the shares, you chose once again not to bail-out @ .0001 during the last run.
I suggest you step out of character for a moment to see just how inconsistent you are with your investments and how silly you appear to the readers on this board.
Not everyone buys into your drama, some of us believe we may win the lottery.
I suggest you sell your measly $500.00 worth of DLAD in the next run, even at a $8-16 dollar commission loss.
Now that’s sound consistent investment advice.
Sounds like you need to upgrade.
Here ya go...
BID:
NITE
DOMS
ETMM
AUTO
MURF
HDSN
Ask:
NITE
ETMM
VNDM
AUTO
LAFC
VFIN
MURF
HDSN
JLEO
DOMS
No change from last L2 posting.