Followers | 71 |
Posts | 3647 |
Boards Moderated | 1 |
Alias Born | 09/16/2009 |
Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:15:15 PM
Personally, I believe SH sent in the name change, however, I’m beginning to think FINRA doesn’t like the way the business structure is set-up with two companies (one private and one public) with the exact same names and chartered in two different states. This to me is a blatant attempt to confuse the investing public thinking the company is larger than what it really is. Also, as I have questioned in a previous message, “what happens to the equity in the public company if it is de-listed?” A business arrangement as such would surly make it easy to divert value to the private company and the bond holders, preferred and common share holders would have nothing to recover from the public company.
Until SH returns to a FULL disclosure policy, he is going to have a difficult time recovering his honor. This alone leads me to believe that his aim is to run the company into the ground. He is showing absolutely no interest in making this company succeed.
Looking forward to your findings,
Schlumpy
Unitronix Corp. to Invest $3 Million in USA Unity Coin Project • UTRX • Oct 7, 2024 7:08 AM
North Bay Resources Announces Assays up to 5 oz/ton Gold, 1.5 oz/ton Platinum, 0.5 oz/ton Palladium, and 0.5 oz/ton Rhodium at Mt. Vernon Gold Mine, Sierra County, California • NBRI • Oct 4, 2024 9:15 AM
Basanite, Inc. Appoints Ali Manav as Interim Chief Executive Officer • BASA • Oct 3, 2024 9:15 AM
Integrated Ventures Announces Launch of MedWell Facilities, LLC and Lease Agreement with Giant Fitness Clubs • INTV • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
Beyond the Horizon: Innovative Drug Combinations Offer New Hope for Alzheimer's and More • NVS • Oct 3, 2024 8:45 AM
SMX and FinGo Enter Into Collaboration Mandate to Develop a Joint 'Physical to Digital' Platform Service To Enhance Natural Rubber Industry's Ability to Report on Sustainable and Ethical Supply Chains • SMX • Oct 3, 2024 7:00 AM